Einstein or Newton

[entruil]

Originally Posted by Saludeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I watched some of that episode but couldn't find what you're referring to. Explain?

And I just read more about the "fabric of space-time" and I see how utterly retarded it actually is. He actually believed, among others, that earth is moving on a 2D plane through space?? There's some many logical problems with that its more sad than funny.

What's holding this 2D plane in place? Geometry below it?

Whats it actually made of besides imaginary lines that artists draw?

What's causing the earth to be pulled downward to begin with?

Why would the earth move instead of resting in the dimple?

Why wouldn't the bodies collide if the "fabric" is malleable and the dimples would merge into one like a real 2D fabric?

What's making the objects move at all?

If the fabric is twisting then it would go the opposite direction once it quickly reached a threshold of resistance, like twisting a rubber band.

If there is "slippage" and the fabric remains twisted while the bodies continue to rotate then what makes them continue despite resistance?

Why are there no planes "on top" pulling them upward or in any other direction?

etc. Now i'm not claiming to be smarter than Einstein but I see why Telsa rejected such a stupid theory. And I hope you guys will think about these things before being brainwashed by literal propaganda. There's a reason why real knowledge is kept secret and theories like this are promoted as fact. And why Einstein was just a theorist while Tesla was a practical inventor.

So what is gravity then? I don't know for sure yet, but but electromagnetic fields of pressure and vortices seem more rational.

man i feel bad about responding ... but... in a fine tuned universe with consideration... why not?... why can't science struggle through hell to find the Truth... not here to go against you... but to my way of thinking... maybe we just both have our own thing and so do they.... the world creates its own image... what we doin...

*Did not read whole thing...*

[Daywolf]

Oy vey, eh? hehehe

1 in 4 Americans Apparently Unaware the Earth Orbits the Sun

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

^ this gif must be what was causing all the lag tonight ^^

[Chaboo_Cleric]

Originally Posted by Saludeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I watched some of that episode but couldn't find what you're referring to. Explain?

And I just read more about the "fabric of space-time" and I see how utterly retarded it actually is. He actually believed, among others, that earth is moving on a 2D plane through space?? There's some many logical problems with that its more sad than funny.

What's holding this 2D plane in place? Geometry below it?

Whats it actually made of besides imaginary lines that artists draw?

What's causing the earth to be pulled downward to begin with if the fabric has no inherent force?

Why would the earth move instead of resting in the dimple?

Why wouldn't the bodies collide if the "fabric" is malleable and the dimples would merge into one like a real 2D fabric?

What's making the objects move at all?

If the fabric is twisting then it would go the opposite direction once it quickly reached a threshold of resistance, like twisting a rubber band.

If there is "slippage" and the fabric remains twisted while the bodies continue to rotate then what makes them continue despite resistance?

Why are there no planes "on top" pulling them upward or in any other direction?

etc. Now i'm not claiming to be smarter than Einstein but I see why Telsa rejected such a stupid theory. And I hope you guys will think about these things before being brainwashed by literal propaganda. There's a reason why real knowledge is kept secret and theories like this are promoted as fact. And why Einstein was just a theorist while Tesla was a practical inventor.

So what is gravity then? I don't know for sure yet, but electromagnetic fields of pressure and vortices seem more rational.

I was going to take the time to answer your questions, but then I realized by doing so, id be equally as smart (or in this case stupid)

Hope that helps

[Saludeen]

Originally Posted by Chaboo_Cleric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was going to take the time to answer your questions, but then I realized by doing so, id be equally as smart (or in this case stupid)

Hope that helps

If you want to believe that space is a 2D fabric (lmao) then go for it.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^ this gif must be what was causing all the lag tonight ^^

yeah srry 'bout that, it was a one off post, prolly larger than I realized. I don't usually pop off big gifs in regular threads, but like that mario akbar/isis gif I repost now and then which was large but I modified it down and re-uploaded it to be more posting friendly here. This will just be buried and forgotten, and the 1/4 of Americans can keep going on imagining the geocentric model ... and done in nothingness ^^

[Saludeen]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yeah srry 'bout that, it was a one off post, prolly larger than I realized. I don't usually pop off big gifs in regular threads, but like that mario akbar/isis gif I repost now and then which was large but I modified it down and re-uploaded it to be more posting friendly here. This will just be buried and forgotten, and the 1/4 of Americans can keep going on imagining the geocentric model ... and done in nothingness ^^

Can you demonstrate with simple logic and proof as to why the sun orbits the earth in your own words? Not implying that you can't, just asking. Because if you can't then that's called blind belief and nullifies any base for criticizing or mocking anyone who thinks otherwise.

That's also why articles like the one you linked should be scrutinized. There was a time when "scientific institutions" like ones we have today would have wrote an article just like that saying, "1 in 4 people don't know that the earth is flat."

And why would the sun be moving in a straight line in the second gif while all other bodies are orbiting? That's an irrational assumption. Did you believe it anyway?

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Saludeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you want to believe that space is a 2D fabric (lmao) then go for it.

Haven't read much lately in this thread.

But the world is indeed 2 dimensional. Plenty of support for this.

3D is merely a perception.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Saludeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you demonstrate with simple logic and proof as to why the sun orbits the earth in your own words? Not implying that you can't, just asking. Because if you can't then that's called blind belief and nullifies any base for criticizing or mocking anyone who thinks otherwise.

That's also why articles like the one you linked should be scrutinized. There was a time when "scientific institutions" like ones we have today would have wrote an article just like that saying, "1 in 4 people don't know that the earth is flat."

And why would the sun be moving in a straight line in the second gif while all other bodies are orbiting? That's an irrational assumption. Did you believe it anyway?

There is so much wrong with that second gif and all you can point out is you don't see a noticeable orbital declination over a tiny tiny period out of a ~250 million year circuit around the milky way galaxy?
M'kay

Why would I try to prove the geocentric model? It's completely false. Or did you mean to ask me to prove the heliocentric model? Geocentrism and the Qur'an: https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Geocentrism_and_the_Quran
http://www.gotquestions.org/geocentrism-Bible.html
Observational proof of the heliocentric model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ocentric_orbit
https://youtu.be/-j9JfMj1rkk

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Chaboo_Cleric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was going to take the time to answer your questions, but then I realized by doing so, id be equally as smart (or in this case stupid)

Hope that helps

I got your back pal. Its pretty much been established that the universe is 2D. It is the only plausible explanation for a lot of things.

I wouldn't answer any of his questions either. We have already covered this content a few months ago in another thread with links (although no one can prove any theory).

2D is still a very plausible theory at the moment, and it could be finally proven in the next 100 years easily as we start experimenting with god particles and dark matter (The Large Hadron Collider was a step in this direction, but we need to move these experiments off-world for safety purposes incase its possible to tear the fabric more easily in areas under the influence of gravity).

Each discovery will further reinforce the fact that dimensions all lie stacked on each other, distance is merely a perception of mass, and wormholes and blackhole physics will be the final smoking gun evidence that the universe is absolutely 2D beyond a reasonable doubt.

Distance is merely a perception of mass within the framework of the fabric.