Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 10-09-2017, 09:57 PM
William_Munny15 William_Munny15 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also bad players. Without Rustle being around, the good player variety of casuals don't exist anymore. Azure Guard is solidly in the casuals being bad at EQ and therefore bitch when EQ doesn't go their way category.
Is that above or below the look at how good we are at everquest category? I'm torn!
__________________
https://s31.postimg.org/y9nzerza3/ag_cheich_1a.jpg
  #172  
Old 10-09-2017, 09:58 PM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,619
Default

Yes.
  #173  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:10 PM
gkmarino gkmarino is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 538
Default

Other than a killing blow KS.. charm has to be the second worst type of KS in my mind, that's full boar!

Roots/snares/agro-spells/wrongful dps -are usually forgiven quite quickly via comms. Charm ksing is a straight up WOT, pedal to the metal type of NO-FUCKS-GIVEN kill steal.

Occasionally even group mates may get confused and a bit shifted temporarily when their own group member charms something they are focusing down. Charming off strangers is trying to play god.
  #174  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:10 PM
kuruu kuruu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 3
Default

I can't see the picture
  #175  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:11 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also bad players. Without Rustle being around, the good player variety of casuals don't exist anymore. Azure Guard is solidly in the casuals being bad at EQ and therefore bitch when EQ doesn't go their way category.
Show us on the doll where AG touched you, Cecily.
  #176  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:14 PM
Droog007 Droog007 is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gkmarino [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Other than a killing blow KS.. charm has to be the second worst type of KS in my mind, that's full boar!
I think you mean bore, and I think you need to read the thread again. If you keep fucking this up, you're going to have to post 100 sentences on the board.
  #177  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:15 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangemang [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1: We never pretended to be camping the gnoll. We openly admitted that we engaged the gnoll at spawn because it was the only legal move we had to try and get a chance at Lodi. This was the first thing said to Sirken from BG.

(You had not killed the gnoll before, therefore it was an open camp as far as camp rules are concerned)

2: We engaged the gnoll first, I have the logs of the encounter and of our conversation with Sirken as proof. It doesn't matter that we weren't there for the gnoll. We made a strategic decision based on what was available. You acknowledged to Sirken that you aren't allowed to charm an engaged mob. (You also gave 2 separate reasons at 2 separate times during our conversation with Sirken as to why you were stalling)

3: Called out in OOC that Charming an engaged mob is considered KS, you did not respond. I was left with only one recourse without risking our group getting a ban by interfering and that was to petition.

4: You weren't even in zone during spawn because we had someone there camping SF at spawn. So don't pull the camp the mob card.

5: You got outplayed. I'm sorry you feel wronged but it was a strategic maneuver, the same as a a leap frog. The game is meant to be competitive in times like this. We came in and saw a weakness in your strategy and we monopolized that weakness. From the very beginning we admitted that we engaged the gnoll to get a chance at Lodi as your shaman was seconds from death until you charmed (an engaged mob that was not going to be alive much longer) and the gnoll ran over to assist.

As said after the GM ruling, it was nothing personal and is a highly contested mob. Just as with any contested mob everyone wants to win. We did nothing wrong, even after you charmed our engaged mob we were told by leadership to stand down and not interfere. Next time a call goes out in OOC in regards to something you have just done, try responding and a GM won't have to be involved. We could have worked something out possibly.

It's a shame it came to that instead of you just admitting that you were outplayed and giving kudos on what was a smart move. I would have, but of course when I go to Lodi on my enchanter I charm the gnoll before spawn/engage because it's just that easy for someone to throw your strategy right out the window.

At the end of the day, it's a game. Don't get your feelings hurt over it. We felt that Sirken should have allowed you two a chance at Lodi without the gnoll and we would have accepted it if you two could have pulled it off. Hell, I would have applauded you both!
Slow down, General Patton. You only need to tell us how smart and good at EQ you are so many times. We got the idea.
  #178  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:20 PM
gkmarino gkmarino is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droog007 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think you mean bore, and I think you need to read the thread again. If you keep fucking this up, you're going to have to post 100 sentences on the board.
Oh how embaressing, you're totally right.

Please let me explain. The issue is that I know of a brewery that makes a DELICIOUS scotch ale and they named it the Full Boar Scotch Ale.. so i love using that phrase improperly now.. I'd apologize but damn I love that scotch ale. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #179  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:21 PM
gkmarino gkmarino is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 538
Default

*embarrassing.. thanks barrackkaa
  #180  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:23 PM
gkmarino gkmarino is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heebs13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Slow down, General Patton. You only need to tell us how smart and good at EQ you are so many times. We got the idea.
Did Heebs12 know how to use bold? Damn Heebs13 you got me excited that edit. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.