Nocturne - Page 19

Nihilist_santa · #**181** 05-09-2013, 09:53 PM

Nocturne are you talking about Gap theory or are you talking about 6 day creation and time dilation/big bang? Gerald Schroeder has some interesting ideas regarding this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u58vxm0BsC8

Hitchens · #**182** 05-09-2013, 10:04 PM

http://www.talkreason.org/articles/schroeder.cfm

Nihilist_santa · #**183** 05-09-2013, 10:09 PM

Strange that video is 40+ min long. You must have watched it very quickly. That or you did not watch it but immediately looked online for some debunker to do your thinking for you.

You guys spout about evolution but all you do is post other peoples words to detract from your own lack of understanding.

Hailto · #**184** 05-09-2013, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Strange that video is 40+ min long. You must have watched it very quickly. That or you did not watch it but immediately looked online for some debunker to do your thinking for you.

You guys spout about evolution but all you do is post other peoples words to detract from your own lack of understanding.

Because its impossible that he could have viewed the video before this thread was even made? What kind of logic is that lol.

Nihilist_santa · #**185** 05-09-2013, 10:11 PM

Yeah.....

Ahldagor · #**186** 05-09-2013, 10:21 PM

what's with this "god's time" thing in regards to usage of "day"?
"day" is an english word derived from what? used in terms of a word used to measure a span of time. if god is on "god's" time then how is god on human time. if you start to quote some Augustine then you've opened the whole trap that the platonization of christianity set up. am curious on to what god's "day" is defined as. though i will applaud Augustine quoting god cause that shit's an ultimate troll.

Hitchens · #**187** 05-09-2013, 10:34 PM

I didn't need to watch 40 minutes worth of video to understand the ideas of a man I'm already familiar with.

If you didn't want feedback perhaps you should have sent a private message.

Autotune · #**188** 05-09-2013, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what's with this "god's time" thing in regards to usage of "day"?
"day" is an english word derived from what? used in terms of a word used to measure a span of time. if god is on "god's" time then how is god on human time. if you start to quote some Augustine then you've opened the whole trap that the platonization of christianity set up. am curious on to what god's "day" is defined as. though i will applaud Augustine quoting god cause that shit's an ultimate troll.

Hmm, does it say it was created in god days or does it just say days?

I'd say, if they didn't specify that it was in god time, then why the fuck would any rational person say that it was in god time? Obviously it is supposed to mean exactly what the fuck it says, regular fucking days.

Autotune · #**189** 05-09-2013, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry I'm not sitting at my computer eagerly awaiting to appease the requests of my presence. I know a great deal about evolution, how else do you think I know that its bullshit? Sorry but unlike you I actually do this thing called research before I take a side. Evolution is not science, period. It is the biggest fraud ever introduced into the scientific community. There isn't a plethora of transitional species like their should be.

The fact that even a tiger and a lion can't produce fertile offspring should be all of the evidence you need to realize that evolution is bullshit but there is oh so much more. These two animals are extremely similar and according to how evolution is supposed to work, there isn't a single logical reason as to why this and so many other exceptions exist.

Then there's the problem of abiogenesis which in order for evolution to be possible, must be proven to be even remotely possible. To date there isn't a single shred of evidence for the possibility of abiogenesis(mostly due to being impossible). Evolution stands in direct defiance with the law of biogenesis which states that in fact no living thing can produce anything other than what it already is. It amazes me how many of you consider yourself scientists and can't even grasp the simple rudimentary concepts of science itself.

Why don't we see a single thing alive on this planet today that appears to be in transitional form when there should be an uncountable number of such things. Why is every animal in existence, virtually exactly how it was since recorded history itself began.

Platypus looks pretty transitional to me.

Nihilist_santa · #**190** 05-09-2013, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Platypus looks pretty transitional to me.

How do you explain "living fossils" like the coelacanth? Here is an example of something existing supposedly for millions of years virtually unchanged.