If a new p99 server opened with forced raid target rotations would you switch?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

haha it's 3 gm's now????

It was 1 before

Guess it'll be like 10 in a few months.

Xzerion, cyrius, hobby...was i missing another?

[Flunklesnarkin]

Apparently TMO would rather argue about which guilds abused GM petitions more than embrace a no gm interference server ;p

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Relapse1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tell the GM's to step aside

Ib strategy when you cant compete blame gm conspiracy and run away with your tail between you legs.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Flunklesnarkin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently TMO would rather argue about which guilds abused GM petitions more than embrace a no gm interference server ;p

Derp tmo has long embraced no gm interference as we come from a server with little to no gm interference.

[Relapse1]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tmo strategy train/kite/exploit/Rmt till it is only us left on the server.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Flunklesnarkin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently TMO would rather argue about which guilds abused GM petitions more than embrace a no gm interference server ;p

TMO would dominate as they've already done. They don't care either way.

It is truly funny that you guys mistake opposition to your point (backed by previous statements of the staff) as TMO not wanting the carebears getting what they want.

I tell you why something won't work/happen and you bring up a guildtag. Who is truly blinded by their own greed?

[Flunklesnarkin]

So your only objection to two servers would be it would split the population but in the same breathe admit that the servers are top heavy.


a split server would alleviate some of the top heavy aspects and allow players to choose the type of server they want to play on.. no gm's at all.. or carebear.


and I have a strong suspicion that the overall population would increase as well.. people love new servers.. and old players that were turned off by the current raid scene would return as well.


It can't turn out any worse than the pvp red experiment lol.. and I would be interested to see which server maintains higher population

[Relapse1]

no need for a 2nd server if you wanna raid and not have to put up with the nonsense Eqmac is more classic and more of a challenge ne way

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Flunklesnarkin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So your only objection to two servers would be it would split the population but in the same breathe admit that the servers are top heavy.


a split server would alleviate some of the top heavy aspects and allow players to choose the type of server they want to play on.. no gm's at all.. or carebear.


and I have a strong suspicion that the overall population would increase as well.. people love new servers.. and old players that were turned off by the current raid scene would return as well.


It can't turn out any worse than the pvp red experiment lol.. and I would be interested to see which server maintains higher population

I don't care about server population. I never dealt with 90% of the people that played when i played.

Again, more GM involvement is something they do not want. Another server adds more work, no matter which way you look at it. It isn't the staffs fault you can't figure out how to solve your own problems. It has always been like this on p99, regarding the raiding scene, not sure what makes you think it has changed. The staff has always expressed interest in making the current server's raiding scene better (or at the least feigned interest), they just haven't followed through.

[Flunklesnarkin]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO would dominate as they've already done. They don't care either way.

It is truly funny that you guys mistake opposition to your point (backed by previous statements of the staff) as TMO not wanting the carebears getting what they want.

I tell you why something won't work/happen and you bring up a guildtag. Who is truly blinded by their own greed?

the only thing you said is that some guilds would try to manipulate the rules.


I'm basically for giving people with philosophical differences a choice... do you want a game with no gm interference.. or a game with strong gm interference..


This current haphazard.. sometimes interfere sometimes don't system.. leads to the complaints we see about guilds having unfair rulings and what not.


Pretty much if somebody is always riding the line trying to squeeze through the rules at the expense of others.. i'm sure they would end up getting transferred to the competitive server and I have more faith in the community to smell a con job than you.

as for the workload.. I don't see a significant increase for them.. instead of monitoring competitive server they would only have to monitor the casual server.. and for stricter enforcement.. I know plenty of casuals would jump at the chance to be guides and create a better game environment. and the people who cause problems on casual server.. just transfer to competitive and forget about it.