#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
Why classic models look better than Luclin models:
__________________
| ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
I am using updated Luclin textures for the zones, just to make everything look more crisp and defined, but I am not using them for the character models. Hell no.
__________________
Mindwarp - Gnome Enchanter
Dunkler - Halfling Druid | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
iksar, trolls and ogres looked better with luclin models. Rhambuk i hate you for disagreeing with me.
| ||
|
#15
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Seriously, armor on classic models were the best. I can't wait for Velious, because I don't think I ever got to experience the armor textures from it.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
#17
|
||||
|
Quote:
i enjoyed some of the luclin models, some were just ugh... the velious armor was fantastic, at least for plate classes. The chain classes got the shaft | |||
|
#18
|
||||
|
Quote:
SOE actually made a statement back then that with new graphics engine (luclin) it will be now Much easier to create new armor texture variations for any race and any model... Which of course, SOE being SOE, never did... Personally I like Luclin model for MOST races, except for humans, barbies and shorties, who look almost indistinguishable in Luclin engine (IMHO WoW actually represented Dwarfs and Gnomes way better than EQ ever did) For DEs I like their plate, but chain and leather looks poor. And I really liked old DE female helmet more, than the new one. Male helmet is uber on other hand Luclin Robes redesigns on other hand are magnificent | |||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
|