Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:30 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

I have had a run in myself with Uthgaard where I was banned for KSing people.

I felt I was justified, he did not and it took a lot of dick sucking to get out. When I was unbanned I realised it is easier to just walk away - Uthgaard style is EXACTLY what we need.

All we need is a guild vs guild PNP forced LNS as I mentioned in the OP - and a GM to be harsh with common sense.
  #12  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:38 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

He banned me after 6 months clean whistle record, with me helpin test red99 coding, just for saying that cherry picking who gets to keep rule breaking names gave a corrupt cop flavor to GMing.

We dont need these kind of idiots with GM powers again

I guess hes not a GM anymore so it doesnt matter?
  #13  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:39 PM
Syft Syft is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 382
Default

Been watching Nizzar run around at Bard speed with no bard for quite some time now.

Doesn't matter about coding and new server's at this point the boxes integrity has been ruined!
  #14  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:43 PM
Bogart Bogart is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Default

More GM banning good idea stasis.
  #15  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:43 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

I have played a long time, and never seen that - and I have fought Nizzar a lot, and been around him a lot.

But hey, maybe he just risks the super huge advantage he has to cut down on travel time, or to beat the 55's left on the box.
  #16  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:45 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

Sirken needs to set the precedent that if you don't want ot be on the new server, and your only purpose is to burn it down you aren't welcome - which is really how common sense operates.

If you act like an asshole at the bar you're booted the fuck out.
  #17  
Old 09-01-2013, 09:50 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken needs to set the precedent that if you don't want ot be on the new server, and your only purpose is to burn it down you aren't welcome - which is really how common sense operates.

If you act like an asshole at the bar you're booted the fuck out.
But where do you draw the line at when a GM must step in and arbitrarily decide that youve camped player X long enough? Maybe he camped him twice as much in the past, is the GM going to research all that shit before pressing that ban button?

Thats why FFA with no xp loss is the best ruleset, youre never going to get around griefers, the most you can do is minimize their impact. Devs failed to implement measures that would minimize griefing because apparently they thought poop camp mechanics were more important. Giving GMs a massive loadwork of sorting out whats real grief or not is a recipe for disaster.

Now theyre going to cluelessly make a new server thats got even more grief potential, with one winning team like nihilum hardcoded in.
Last edited by Tradesonred; 09-01-2013 at 10:01 PM..
  #18  
Old 09-01-2013, 11:34 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

I understand, if you think teams is a design to fix the end game - you'll see this as a stupid idea.

Server repops might be a way around variance - we'll see, it's an idea.
  #19  
Old 09-01-2013, 11:56 PM
Bardalicious Bardalicious is offline
Planar Protector

Bardalicious's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,684
Default

lol hacking on live was far more rampant than here what are u smoking. SoE literally gave 0 fucks so long as they got that subscript son.

good luck trying to change the community here bro. only ppl still willing to play these pvp boxes are the worst offenders in regards to taking enjoyment from griefing others, even on a 100 pop box that needs every person it can get. we will never find the community balance that made these servers work bc lets face it, a lot of blue players back in the day rolled on pvp not knowing what they were getting into. and they banded together for the sake of enjoying the game.

now it's all lol hit max lvl asap, know all tactics every item drop max lewt GRIEF GRIEF GRIEF. nihilum had the chance to set the standard when they came out on top, and instead, they turned into the very guilds that they defeated. doubt it'll change on a new box pals.
  #20  
Old 09-01-2013, 11:58 PM
Syft Syft is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I understand, if you think teams is a design to fix the end game - you'll see this as a stupid idea.

Server repops might be a way around variance - we'll see, it's an idea.
FACT: High end pvp has degraded into who has the most clicks, all Nihilum does is golem/conflag/blazing/ice wand or trak tooth me to death every single fight. If I get them low they soulfire charge or gate pot away.

Until those mechanics are nerfed this server will remain a joke and any new server will face the same issue as they'll farm dead red99 and role over with entire guildbanks filled with golem wands and gate pots, and start the hack fest all over again.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.