Can we talk like adults and have some actual moderation here?

[Bazia]

The plans and trajectory for Red99 change every 6 months based on whoever Sirken's current side kick is.

First there was Amelinda, who banned people for crude names, was anti /ooc, very hands on with suspending people for "grief" before the pnp, very inconsistent.

With Zade we finally got fast exp, /ooc, YT, etc. more of the eq deathmatch vibe.

Then with Alecta we got pvp resists fixes, tons of teams99 talk, and then a exodus of people from red99 assuming teams was a few months down the line.

Now with Deru we get reduced exp, threats of limiting or removing /ooc, talk of establishing low and mid game communities.

The problem is the lack of consistency of the goals, which results in a lack of consistency of population.

I'm not saying all the problems are staff related, but there is never the same vision or goals for this server for any extended period of time which results in constant population peaks and dives.

Sirken pal, just spend 3 months and come up once and for all what your vision for this server is please god. Classic style like blue, or VZTZ style.

Everytime the vision changes there is more legacy problems including, endless alts from fast exp, people who now are addicted to /ooc and will not play without it, etc.

Need the final decisive decisions mang, oh yeah and relaunch once you've made them.

[Bazia]

^

Longest post I've ever made on the internet

hehehe sorry

[Bazia]

chortled

[Faerie]

I miss Amelinda and her hard stance on stupid names.

[Azure]

Except for 3 out of 4 of those sidekicks the community should be fucking happy they are getting attention.

Yet ya'll come on here and bitch because your personal grand plan for a thriving AoN market is not being catered to.

[Bazia]

bitch cuz server is being chain sabotaged, intentionally or not

can't keep changing your mind on what u want this server to be every 4 months, well u can but we see what happens to the population every time you decide to roll out huge policy changes

pick something, stick to it for at least a year or so jeez

[Bazia]

chortled

[Potus]

Here's where we're at on the server

Step 1: Nerf Exp
Step 2:
Step 3: Low level players' paradise

Yes it's a ridiculous idea and yet the GMs cannot really explain why they think this will work. They keep presenting stories of people not affording spells and blowing through content and being burned out at level 52. The original thread posted by Deru was like 20+ pages of him explaining himself and yet it never made sense.

[Tradesonred]

Originally Posted by Potus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes it's a ridiculous idea and yet the GMs cannot really explain why they think this will work. They keep presenting stories of people not affording spells and blowing through content and being burned out at level 52. The original thread posted by Deru was like 20+ pages of him explaining himself and yet it never made sense.

Again real funny thing was Sirken claiming afterwards that Deru was one of the only ones on staff to oppose the nerf, like how did that slip through, hes that unaware of what deru thinks or was just trying to get the last word in the conversation, or what? That felt like a short window into what goes on behind the scenes (Sirken seemingly not knowing Derus opinion on the nerf, seemingly never been made aware of Derus big post on why nerf was needed) and it didnt look good.

[Faerie]

Originally Posted by Potus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Step 1: Nerf Exp
Step 2:
Step 3: Low level players' paradise

xD