Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Important > News & Announcements

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2010, 12:33 AM
rioisk rioisk is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 271
Default

*gets the popcorn ready*
  #2  
Old 08-14-2010, 12:51 AM
Datante Datante is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 47
Default

A what-if situation:

Guild A is sitting in SolB with a 15+ raid force. Guild B starts to enter the zone, so Guild A moves into a proper camping position within aggro radius of Nagafen's spawn point to claim rights to the mob.

Time passes. At some point Guild C and Guild D enter the zone.

When Nagafen spawns, the environment looks like this:
-Guild A is in aggro range (with 15 in the Lair, and another 15 or so outside the area, around the wall).
-Guild B, Guild C and Guild D all have 15+ in Tranix's throne room, not interfering with Guild A.

So, Guild A gets aggro (rightful, clear claim), but cannot hold aggro consistently due to AFKs (the idea was to pull Naggy back to the wall as per the common tactic). Small wipe of the first 15 near the spawn. Naggy resets. The other guilds rush forward.

Are all four guilds now free to aggro him and lay claim? How can they possibly tell who engages him first when 50 people zerg the dragon immediatey after the first guild temporarily loses aggro?
Last edited by Datante; 08-14-2010 at 12:53 AM..
  #3  
Old 08-14-2010, 01:21 AM
Humwawa Humwawa is offline
Sarnak

Humwawa's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 316
Default

Perhaps we're expected to play civilly with each other. That's my guess.
__________________
Athiyk Phor`Phalar - Priest of the Hate God.
Daishelo D`Avol - Coercer to the Spires of Innoruuk.
http://db.goonquest.com/profiles/317
  #4  
Old 08-14-2010, 01:52 AM
Webwolf Webwolf is offline
Kobold

Webwolf's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 191
Default

So we will have less GM interference, less camping and more competition? FFA in a nutshell. I like it.
  #5  
Old 08-14-2010, 04:08 AM
Noleafclover Noleafclover is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datante [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A what-if situation:

Guild A is sitting in SolB with a 15+ raid force. Guild B starts to enter the zone, so Guild A moves into a proper camping position within aggro radius of Nagafen's spawn point to claim rights to the mob.

Time passes. At some point Guild C and Guild D enter the zone.

When Nagafen spawns, the environment looks like this:
-Guild A is in aggro range (with 15 in the Lair, and another 15 or so outside the area, around the wall).
-Guild B, Guild C and Guild D all have 15+ in Tranix's throne room, not interfering with Guild A.

So, Guild A gets aggro (rightful, clear claim), but cannot hold aggro consistently due to AFKs (the idea was to pull Naggy back to the wall as per the common tactic). Small wipe of the first 15 near the spawn. Naggy resets. The other guilds rush forward.

Are all four guilds now free to aggro him and lay claim? How can they possibly tell who engages him first when 50 people zerg the dragon immediatey after the first guild temporarily loses aggro?
As spawn windows close (<5 hours), I think this certainly will happen (I don't think we'll all be polite and sit far far away in tranix's room =p).

But I think a player-made rule of FCFS at that point, just like at any restaurant or the DMV, or a dev addition of that (though it seems they want to keep it very simple) fixes the problem.
__________________
Accersitus Mage
Ennui Monk
Vita mid 40s Cleric
  #6  
Old 08-14-2010, 12:46 AM
Emoqq Emoqq is offline
Kobold

Emoqq's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 120
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 08-14-2010, 12:51 AM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

I personally have no problem with these new rules and prefer them to the old ones. I'd put away the popcorn though, because I don't think they're really going to change all that much. We'll see.
  #8  
Old 08-14-2010, 09:13 PM
Dukat Dukat is offline
Orc

Dukat's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 32
Default

While I think these rules are a massive improvement, theres still a very large GM presence in our raid scene. People can still get banned, people are still going to petition, players are still going to cry to mommy and daddy when things do not go as planned.

Honestly I'd rather be looking over my shoulder watching for trains and ninjas, then to look over my shoulder watching my whole guild get banned because of petitions over some "he said she said". Or having to run fraps 24/7 in an attempt to catch the other guild redhanded and tell on them like its the school playground (I've never been a tattletale and im not looking to start now).

All in all, gratitude to Nilbog for loosening his grip on the raid scene a touch. I know it is not easy to satisfy the various demands of a growing playerbase. I urge the raiding scene to act responsibly with the trust the GM's have extended to us. I also hope that eventually the GM's will build enough confidence in our guild leaders to cut the apron strings and let us handle the endless drama on our own.

Dukat 50 SK [SUSPENDED]
Dural 28 Wizard
  #9  
Old 08-14-2010, 12:51 AM
nerfed nerfed is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 118
Default

So we can leap frog guilds clearing fear for CT right? Need zone / boss specific rules.
  #10  
Old 08-14-2010, 02:19 AM
Holey Holey is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,051
Default

i know everyones going to rage.. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Holey 57 Cleric -STRIPPED/RETIRED
Gream Cheese the King of Thieves 60 Rogue
RIP Rygrim
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.