![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
![]() Rangers are fine, p99wannabeminmaxerfashionistas not so much.
Out of every 100 p99ers who dis rangers (and paladins and shadowknights), there's one really good player with a bad attitude and 99 anxious twits who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
| ||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() rangers should dual wield with slow weapons. 2h is for scrubs and int casters without good gear.
__________________
Fairiedust Freesyourmind, Enchanter
Also, a dude. | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
![]() bring back the compass
| ||
|
#15
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
We demand justice for the navigationally challenged!
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
| |||
|
#16
|
|||
|
![]() Rangers have always been viable. They are just better now with some cool buffs and great gear.
| ||
|
#17
|
|||
|
![]() Man you guys rock for taking the time out to post your thoughts and opinions. Haha I think it would be pretty neat to roll a char that not many other people use. Rangers seem fun. Def a class you have to be engaged with. We'll see guys haha! Food for thought anyways.
| ||
|
#18
|
|||
|
![]() Problem with rangers is they're basically druids with below average melee prowess. And druids are basically bad clerics/wizards. So you're a halfbreed of a class that's already a halfbreed. Only thing ranger does the best is Track, and I guess CoP buffbot.
Story of hybrids. Until AAs came along, they had no real purpose. Live with it!
__________________
Brutillus 60 Dragon Hero Bracer Shadowknight - <Awakened>
| ||
|
#19
|
|||
|
![]() it's like seeing Michelangelo's David for the first time
__________________
go go go
| ||
|
#20
|
|||
|
![]() Not sure who told you ranger was a subpar melee, but they were wrong - probably didn't understand what weapons to use in main/off either. I'd really like to parse against some of your monks.
__________________
Atomos Human Ranger <Divinity>
Atomos Human Bard | ||
|
![]() |
|
|