Can someone confirm?

[Smedy]

if people are so concerned about what the antihax is doing the only way to truly know is to hire a professional to audit the source code of the antihax dll

trusting that redguides in this matter is as good as trusting rogean, you just can't know for certain

if that redguides admin could post some actual evidence of his findings it would be relevant to my interests

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if people are so concerned about what the antihax is doing the only way to truly know is to hire a professional to audit the source code of the antihax dll

trusting that redguides in this matter is as good as trusting rogean, you just can't know for certain

if that redguides admin could post some actual evidence of his findings it would be relevant to my interests

We (secrets, myself, et al) already explained why this is not possible without $ investment or some serious beard who loves to piss away his time gets involved on the project, even then reverse engineering it from ASM could be misinterpreted. So no beard will bother putting 100 hours into something that can still be wrong and not 100% clear.

Without the source code, you will never know the full capabilities of the .dll.

Thanks for the post tho pal.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

trusting that redguides in this matter is as good as trusting rogean, you just can't know for certain

if that redguides admin could post some actual evidence of his findings it would be relevant to my interests

They didn't do shit, and they can't prove shit. Or they would have released the work that was performed and the code they were able to reverse engineer.

We also went over this at length sorry you missed the meaningful discussion while your roommate muhammad played grab ass with you at your shared triple bunk communal housing unit.

[Xaanka]

man, postin on reddit after getting the b& hammer.. GG's gone full kimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[bubur]

dont know wut the top 3/4 posts are saying: bunch of hacker shit that no one asked about imo



here look at my mom https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIpQbKs5lMs

[hammbone]

so it's cool for this project to give out our personal infos with the intent of doxxing us?

[Smedy]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We (secrets, myself, et al) already explained why this is not possible without $ investment or some serious beard who loves to piss away his time gets involved on the project, even then reverse engineering it from ASM could be misinterpreted. So no beard will bother putting 100 hours into something that can still be wrong and not 100% clear.

Without the source code, you will never know the full capabilities of the .dll.

Thanks for the post tho pal.

Exactly, but one would think it's in rogeans best interest that these rumors don't escalate cause it could result in the takedown of the project. So if he indeed isn't snooping on his users why not hire a unbiased professional audit team and give them the source code, if you have nothing to hide there's no reason not to.

The only issue would be the money to pay for audit, so if someone made a go fund the community could easily chip in 5$ a pop and you'd have paid the audit with ease and everyone can rest easy.

Rest easy until rogean patches the dll again i guess

[Zade]

I've seen the code.



It was in the breifcase.



[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Xaanka]

^ haha i'm dying ^

[JboxCSU]

Originally Posted by bubur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if im being real about it: here you go my personal picture

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your forehead is glorious