Ok! No Luclin....BUT what if got some patches?! :D

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by renordw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, the archery bonus would be nice. Right now it's pointless to really use your bow.

Lies!!!!! Archery is amazing!!! It is a hard path, but has secret powers!!!

[Sorn]

One day I'm going to stream Rosen in action so everyone can see the true majesty of rangers.

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Sorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One day I'm going to stream Rosen in action so everyone can see the true majesty of rangers.

Then everyone would reroll as an archer!!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

In classic live, maining a ranger, rangers were baaaad aaaass! just all the other classes were OP [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

l2p?

[Baler]

No Luclin

I swear you tell people they can't have something and it just makes them want it more.

[Sorn]

Originally Posted by Ivory [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then everyone would reroll as an archer!!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ASHITAKAAAAAAA!!

[Morningbreath]

Beastlords yes, Luclin no. Their pets were awesome. Dot stacking needs to happen regardless.

[fadetree]

No beastlords. No peck rangers, either. Gnomes I don't care about.

[Ivory]

No beastlords....nothing FROM luclin....just the patches that fixed stuff in the old game the couple months after luclin.

Like...gnome paladins [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jimjam]

I'd be down with Halfling rangers if I was the only one allowed to roll them.

Gnomes are lame regardless of class, so I'll let them have whatever they want since I will think they are a bunch of multiboxing, RMTing hackers no matter what. Hell, even let them have monk.