![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
If you could manage to get them single, this is the type of fight where the warrior with disc would shine.
__________________
| |||
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
#4
|
|||
|
![]() I haven’t seen many if any wipes from a sham/monk duo due to aggro and inability to land slow. Typically at that level of gameplay where a slow is critically needed to succeed - both players are seasoned enough that they know how to roll with the punches. Wipes under these circumstances is honestly a player skill issue.
Snap aggro is less important in this duo to be honest … unlike a group scenario where you’re competing with rogues.
__________________
| ||
#5
|
|||
|
![]() he said twinked, the amount of twink gear with hot, kael bosses (vindi, statue, aow), VP, ring 10 etc, who cares what it is, unless he doesnt really mean twinked. there is levels to this.
| ||
#6
|
|||
|
![]() The OP is asking about a sk or warrior. While a lot of other combos would work (I like pally here) I’m guessing it’s a preference of the parties.
Realistically in this case the window for what you can do with a warrior and torp/slow over a knight is pretty slim. Compared to the ability to split camps and move through contact thanks to snare/fd/rest the dead. That said, a tank and shaman make a very solid basis for a trio. You can easily blaze to 60 and if you have desire to do certain camps add a CC or lull/harmo/fd class and you just get more options. | ||
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|