Donation Rewards

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Aaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't even start that shit in this thread.

Why? It's classic.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Dac321]

Originally Posted by Derazor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This. Id definitely start playing my toon again if I could box and I would put up some $ for sure.

Witch!! I would pay to NOT have people 2 boxing.

[bionicbadger]

no boxing. no rezes. Nothing that affects gameplay.

I like the idea of a different colored name and a mark or something in the forums to note people that have donated.

If there is some in game toy that is no drop with no stats but a cool graphic, that would be ok too.

[Tallenn]

I was thinking some kind of in-game title, but controllable by the player whether or not it shows- some people might want to remain anonymous about their donations.

Also, maybe special titles or rights on the forum. Nothing on the forum will affect gameplay.

There's also the benefit we all already get: the server stays open!

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Tallenn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was thinking some kind of in-game title, but controllable by the player whether or not it shows- some people might want to remain anonymous about their donations.

Also, maybe special titles or rights on the forum. Nothing on the forum will affect gameplay.

There's also the benefit we all already get: the server stays open!

Honestly, giving in-game titles out for donations cheapens in-game titles, IMO. Those should be for very special occasions only.

Boxing doesn't affect game-play adversely. No idea why people would care so much about this, assuming it's limited to those that donate regularly.

[shinobi wan kenobi]

Originally Posted by Ferok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Boxing doesn't affect game-play adversely. No idea why people would care so much about this, assuming it's limited to those that donate regularly.

So you want a world where one person is locking down each camp? Derp.

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by shinobi wan kenobi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you want a world where one person is locking down each camp? Derp.

Depends on the camp. Many camps can be soloed regardless.

It wasn't any less of a problem in classic than it would be here. Can't remember having an issue with it there.

[Aaron]

Take your nonsense boxing requests to a different thread. It's a beaten-to-death topic and it's not happening. And it's especially not happening in exchange for bribery. This thread is for actual discussion of legitimate ideas.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Ferok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It wasn't any less of a problem in classic than it would be here.

In 1999, with 0.01% of the players being able to afford/obtain multiple internet connections, multiple PCs and multiple accounts, I'd say it would be much more of an issue here. Some of that is speculation, but the percentage of players that had this setup prior to Luclin is negligible.

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Aaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Take your nonsense boxing requests to a different thread. It's a beaten-to-death topic and it's not happening. And it's especially not happening in exchange for bribery. This thread is for actual discussion of legitimate ideas.

Way to arbitrarily define concepts as "legitimate" and "bribery" based on your own personal feelings on them.