I said "Launch the nukes!", it was a joke.

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Skyking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not afraid, but not being allowed to shout fire in a crowded theater means we're doomed

also does anyone else remember that this is exactly how the old thread started?

Are you afraid then?

It is possible for there to be a fire and simultaneously shout fire while running in to save burning children, and not be afraid.

P.s. my warning was lifted and comment restored after a human reviewed my appeal. Still the theatre is full of smoke.

[Skyking]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you afraid then?

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

P.s. my warning was lifted and comment restored after a human reviewed my appeal. Still the theatre is full of smoke.

Congrats. If anything that should have been a politics ban anyway.

[Skyking]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Skyking]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Skyking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not afraid, but not being allowed to shout fire in a crowded theater means we're doomed

Isn't that fake? Dictum in Schenck which was overturned anyway.

[Skyking]

>The change in the standard reflects a broader understanding of free speech rights, with the "imminent lawless action" test providing greater protection to speech than the "clear and present danger" test

stopped there idk the changes, but you sign a TOS where you posted so 1a doesn't even apply I'm pretty sure, i mean the argument about twitter was town square or someshit but nothing actually got passed i assume

more interested in how 150 million dollars in burritos isn't getting paid tbh it's only 0.5% of the customers apparently but jesus christ.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Skyking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

>The change in the standard reflects a broader understanding of free speech rights, with the "imminent lawless action" test providing greater protection to speech than the "clear and present danger" test

stopped there idk the changes, but you sign a TOS where you posted so 1a doesn't even apply I'm pretty sure, i mean the argument about twitter was town square or someshit but nothing actually got passed i assume

Okay but if they make the reference in support you get to call un duck un duck.

[Reiwa]

A false predicate is fatal to the construct.

[Skyking]

the downfall of society begins with the individual, especially if the individual is advocating for nuclear holocaust.

and people not paying their burrito debts