Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Trading Hub

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:04 PM
Extunarian Extunarian is offline
Planar Protector

Extunarian's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 1,186
Default

Bob has crushed you with his wallet.
__________________
Jorg Shaman
  #12  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:06 PM
Hagglebaron Hagglebaron is offline
Sarnak

Hagglebaron's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 406
Default

Don't argue with my man Bob on economics son
__________________
  #13  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:23 PM
Supaskillz Supaskillz is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,167
Default

Lol. It doesn't take an economist to see that trading an item whose current value is 240k for an item whose current value is 180k is a bad deal, even if you suspect those prices will chance. Sell the tunic buy the stone profit extra pp, unless the time it takes to make 2 forums posts and respond to pms is worth giving up that 40-70k profit to you. Bob would not take this trade at this point in time and he knows it.

In addition I don't disagree that fungi tunic is not likely to stay at 200-250k range forever, but I was simply pointing that the blanket statement that tunic loses value over time has already been proven false by the last 6 months.
  #14  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:30 PM
Appollo Appollo is offline
Sarnak

Appollo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supaskillz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In addition I don't disagree that fungi tunic is not likely to stay at 200-250k range forever, but I was simply pointing that the blanket statement that tunic loses value over time has already been proven false by the last 6 months.
Explain to me how that makes sense? It seems like you're saying two inapposite things. Also, an economist would look at the long-term par value of an item, not the immediate turn-over, in order to maximize profit. See Citizen1080 supra
__________________
Appollo
  #15  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:40 PM
Supaskillz Supaskillz is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Appollo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Explain to me how that makes sense? It seems like you're saying two inapposite things. Also, an economist would look at the long-term par value of an item, not the immediate turn-over, in order to maximize profit. See Citizen1080 supra
I am a graduate student and MSU(Michigan State) and I actually teach Microeconomics. Let me try to explain it more explicitly.

Option 1: Trade fungi tunic for manastone. Cost=1 fungi tunic + time to do 1 transaction. Benefit = 1 manastone

Option 2: Sell fungi tunic for 240k. Buy manastone for 180k. Cost= 1 fungi tunic + time to do 2 transactions. benefit= 1 manastone + 60k

Thus option 2 is better unless the time of one transaction is greater than 60k for you.

Long term consequences of both trades are the same, the only difference is that with option 2 you have extra platinum than can be invested.


Edit: Stinkum gets it
Last edited by Supaskillz; 08-26-2011 at 03:47 PM..
  #16  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:44 PM
Stinkum Stinkum is offline
Planar Protector

Stinkum's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,050
Default

Suppose everything Bob said is true.

Suppose I have a Fungi, and I agree that a Manastone will be worth more than Fungi sooner or later and want to attain a Manastone.

Now, tell me. Why would I straight trade my Fungi for a Manastone today when I can log into EQ, and sell my Fungi in EC for 225-250k, and buy a new Manastone for ~175k?

How do you not understand this? Are you still in middle school or a high school dropout?
Last edited by Stinkum; 08-26-2011 at 03:51 PM..
  #17  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:57 PM
citizen1080 citizen1080 is offline
Planar Protector

citizen1080's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Your Wallet
Posts: 2,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supaskillz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am a graduate student and MSU(Michigan State) and I actually teach Microeconomics. Let me try to explain it more explicitly.

Option 1: Trade fungi tunic for manastone. Cost=1 fungi tunic + time to do 1 transaction. Benefit = 1 manastone

Option 2: Sell fungi tunic for 240k. Buy manastone for 180k. Cost= 1 fungi tunic + time to do 2 transactions. benefit= 1 manastone + 60k

Thus option 2 is better unless the time of one transaction is greater than 60k for you.

Long term consequences of both trades are the same, the only difference is that with option 2 you have extra platinum than can be invested.


Edit: Stinkum gets it
Correct. All I was stating is long term i would rather have a manastone in my pocket than a fungi tunic. And in another month or so I would guess they will be of equal value before stone passes it up.

I have a feeling a group of people is locking down the fungi tunics and feeding them very slowly into the market to keep prices at a premium.

Sadly that person is not me
__________________
Bob the Broker
  #18  
Old 08-26-2011, 04:02 PM
Supaskillz Supaskillz is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,167
Default

Well King is mostly uncamped lately. Daltheb seems to have made it his mission to end that though. However he is selling his as he gets them it seems. The spawn rate of king has really turned people off of the camp. The last 25 hours I spent in that camp I did not see any king spawns.
  #19  
Old 08-26-2011, 04:03 PM
Appollo Appollo is offline
Sarnak

Appollo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 211
Default

"Investment", now you're talking. As for Stinkum's rhetorical question: No, I'm not in middle school nor a high school drop out. There's not need to get smart with me. I merely asked a question to which he answered succinctly. I thank you for that.

I suppose the upside to the trade from the individual with the Fungi Tunic would be that they do not have to hope that someone would sell them a manastone for 175K presently. To be sure, that's the present price. But, you're taking something of a risk that (1) someone will be around to sell that item to you at the present time and price without (2) someone else bidding you up or (3) the item not being for sale. But, I suppose that's what you mean by "time being worth the 60K".
__________________
Appollo
Last edited by Appollo; 08-26-2011 at 04:03 PM.. Reason: Grammar
  #20  
Old 08-26-2011, 04:43 PM
5150 5150 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by citizen1080 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fungi's lose value as time goes by..manastones gain value..i fail to see how this is a bad deal for the fungi owner....

Manastones = 250k once hole comes out is my guess.
when that happens we will all be old and very gray
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.