Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:10 AM
SoulLeech SoulLeech is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevlar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
economy + weight, if it was just economy people would have a backpack full of clubs. Most druids don't have 255 strength though so daggers are the most obvious choice. Has nothing at all to do with some necro pet myth.
Delicious.

You're trying and failing at splitting hairs to presumably save face over some incredibly trivial shit here.

Please cook me up a dissertation on the distinction of weight from the larger question of economy with a second course of outrage at my use of the word "trivial". Naturally, I'll take that served over the false premise that what started this is somehow mutually exclusive.

For dessert I'll have a further demonstration of your classic EQ ignorance to top off that bit about the necro pet "myth" above.
  #12  
Old 10-18-2011, 11:38 AM
Extunarian Extunarian is offline
Planar Protector

Extunarian's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 1,186
Default

Weight and size is a pretty big issue when comparing the cheapest weapons that vendors carry in unlimited quantity:

club (5wt, size: medium)
vs
dagger (2.5wt, size:small)

I always keep a stock of daggers in a large soiled bag. Clubs wouldn't fit since that bag only holds small sized items, and I'm not going to buy a tink bag just to carry around 10x pet weapons.

As an aside: Carrying a fishing pole and bait is also a good idea...with a high fishing skill I can usually fish 2 rusty daggers out of the water when I run out of my vendor-bought daggers.
__________________
Jorg Shaman
  #13  
Old 10-18-2011, 11:46 AM
Kassel Kassel is offline
Fire Giant

Kassel's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 682
Default

Weight is the main issue by far.
__________________
<< Nester the Molester - 60 Rogue >>

<< Hassel the Hoff - Druid of the 55th Grind >>
<< Kassel the Koff - Monk of the 52st Train >>
  #14  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:48 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulLeech [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Delicious.

You're trying and failing at splitting hairs to presumably save face over some incredibly trivial shit here.

Please cook me up a dissertation on the distinction of weight from the larger question of economy with a second course of outrage at my use of the word "trivial". Naturally, I'll take that served over the false premise that what started this is somehow mutually exclusive.

For dessert I'll have a further demonstration of your classic EQ ignorance to top off that bit about the necro pet "myth" above.
On the other hand you are accomplishing little more than terminology masturbation and gloating like a sophomoric English student.

You proposed in idea. Most people disagreed archaic logic is still being applied by educated players. You became upset and looked up the word "economy". Game...set...match? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Last edited by Snaggles; 10-18-2011 at 12:52 PM..
  #15  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:56 PM
pickled_heretic pickled_heretic is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
On the other hand you are accomplishing little more than terminology masturbation and gloating like a sophomoric English student.

You proposed in idea. Most people disagreed archaic logic is still being applied by educated players. You became upset and looked up the word "economy". Game...set...match? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this is such a retarded thing to argue about but there are people in my guild who still believe that pet dps is affected by delay on p1999.
  #16  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:14 PM
SoulLeech SoulLeech is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
On the other hand you are accomplishing little more than terminology masturbation and gloating like a sophomoric English student.
Can't gloat without being victorious. Thanks for your support.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you spent more time attempting to help people than acting like a smarmy fuck perhaps a rudimentary question could be answered in less than two pages.
Dismissive asshatery begat smarmy fuckery. Kill it at the root.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It has nothing to do with the "necro myth", which in reality was never a myth as it at one point TRULY was reality (hence the nerf).
My point exactly, your demonstrated lack of comprehension by believing you need to reiterate it to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You proposed in idea. Most people disagreed archaic logic is still being applies by educated players. You became upset and looked up the word "economic". Game...set...match? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Educated players? Like the one actually believed Necro pet delay be to be a myth or those who have consistently failed to comprehend the OP's request for an exception to the well understood matter of efficiency?

Got it.
  #17  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:15 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this is such a retarded thing to argue about but there are people in my guild who still believe that pet dps is affected by delay on p1999.
True.

Hrmmm, I had no clue. I stand corrected [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For the record though rebutting with the definition of "economy" is still the most retarded thing I have seen since that clip of Taylor Swift rapping...


Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulLeech [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
*hugging a Thesaurus*
The only victory you have achieved is having half the thread readers digging through their User CP for ignore settings.

Next time aim for eloquence AND a point.
Last edited by Snaggles; 10-18-2011 at 01:23 PM..
  #18  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:52 PM
SoulLeech SoulLeech is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For the record though rebutting with the definition of "economy" is still the most retarded thing I have seen since that clip of Taylor Swift rapping...
Really? My personal favorite is the guy tried to be cute by posting the definition of "myth" then quickly edited it when he realized he was utterly wrong and talking out of his ass.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Next time aim for eloquence AND a point.
I'm not sure eloquence is the word your looking for here. I should give you my unabridged thesaurus.

I've discovered that it just isn't economical to lug around a 4.5 pound book when I can just use the app on my phone.

Kisses.
Last edited by SoulLeech; 10-18-2011 at 02:06 PM..
  #19  
Old 10-18-2011, 06:09 PM
Kevlar Kevlar is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulLeech [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Really? My personal favorite is the guy tried to be cute by posting the definition of "myth" then quickly edited it when he realized he was utterly wrong and talking out of his ass.



I'm not sure eloquence is the word your looking for here. I should give you my unabridged thesaurus.

I've discovered that it just isn't economical to lug around a 4.5 pound book when I can just use the app on my phone.

Kisses.
No idea why you are getting so butt hurt over this. Snaggles correctly answered the question with post number four. He managed to do that with a fraction of the energy you seem to enjoy wasting on grammar lessons that no one cares about.

Maybe you should be more economical with your vocabulary, like snaggles, instead of being such a whiner.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.