wtb

[Jadian]

That's not very nice to say about Uthgaard/Amelinda.

[SamwiseRed]

Lol if they are the ones deciding what is and what's not an exploit then we are all doomed. Common sense fail going on if you think ghosting past a zone line is legit. So I guess getting under the world is okay too?

[SamwiseRed]

Btw I don't think amelinda ruled on this. I think she took uthgaards lame as explanation as truth when to be honest didn't even make sense. Find post saying it is okay to exceed the boundaries of a zone by rogean or amelinda and I'll stop bitching.

[Nirgon]

They said not to do it. Uthgaard (who doesnt GM here anymore) said that the one behind the king in Lguk is not an exploit. That makes sense since I don't think you have to plug or wtfever you do to get behind it.

Special Ed and company (guess who) immediately applied this to everything and used it as a defense.

[Jadian]

I specifically asked Amelinda about it on IRC. About Tibberz being bound behind the specific zoneline that's in question.

Reply was "its ok"

[Titanuk]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whoever came up with the idea that getting behind the zone line is not an exploit is full retard.

lol tru

[Steaks2]

being bound behind a wall is fine

lol ?

can you fight dragons from behind the wall too where aoes dont hit?

[Nirgon]

^ I guess