![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
at 105+ you swing 1 per min, at 205 which is ONE HUNDRED DEX MORE you swing 1.5 per min. Do you understand how much more dex 100 is from 105? Do you know how little high dex gear there is? If you add 50 dex from 100, your proc rate goes from 1 to 1.25. That is NOT a noticeable increase during combat. Do you know what probabilities are? Please do not call me out unless you have some actual comment. "Don't listen to that guy OP, I heard dex was the best 100 dex gives you 5000 more procs per second huehuehuehue" Dex is good, but in small amounts dex is a worthless stat.
__________________
| |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() To reiterate Tecmos point, I believe he was trying to tell the OP to AT LEAST get his Dex up to 105, as it is a mere 72.
| ||
|
#13
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
That aside, you posted earlier (and again in the post I just quoted above) and basically said that it was useless for the OP to get any dex unless he was going to get a lot of dex, and that isn't true. Procs aren't some exponential thing, where +50 dex gives you 1x more procs, another +50 gives you 3x more procs, and another +50 gives you 9x more procs. It's linearish. Every single 1 point of dex is valuable, very valuable, for a warrior who is trying to hold aggro in groups. And because you don't understand that, I told the OP to ignore you. Granted, the effect of a few points of dex is not something you can really notice in any given fight. But neither is the effect of a few points of anything. But that isn't going to stop a player from taking an upgrade just because it's only a small upgrade. That isn't going to stop that small ugprade from having a difference in every single fight, even if you can't really notice it. That isn't going to stop multiple small upgrades from eventually yielding noticable returns on a fight-to-fight basis, to say nothing of the long run. Go herptydurp somewhere where you won't be disturbing the rest of us, please. | |||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 08-24-2012 at 11:16 PM..
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
![]() The effects of raising dex is minimal unless you can get a whole heap of it. The fact that its linear or not does not change the fact that dex in small amounts (when you're trading off things like AC AND HP----(which you ARE ASKING HIM TO DO)) is NOT beneficial. You are correct that I was looking at the stock values, which I agree is wrong. But I also am quite sure there was a dev post about 2h and 1hs having different values, but I'm not going to argue that without a direct quote.
My point here is the fact that you are completely disregarding the other stats (such as hp-str-ac) which are in lower levels, even more beneficial than a few extra points of dex, especially since its only VARIABLY affects your aggro gaining abilities (unlike str, which allows you to continuously hit harder & carry more which allows you to have different weps for different situations, AC which is the entire role of warriors, and hp because hp). To reiterate my point, given the proc function given by Kanras in that post, every 83 increase in dex would only raise your proc rate by .5 which admittedly, is not terrible, but how many low levels can afford 83 dex. You're asking him to raise his dex by a FEW dozen AT BEST. And that is just not going to be noticeable in the long term. Here is an example of why dex is stupid; Lets say he raises his dex to 100, from 72, at the cost of many of his str and ac items. In a fight he will proc approximately 1.125 (each 83 being .5 more) versus the .9 proc he would have normally have. That means in an average of EIGHT MINUTES he will proc NINE TIMES VERSUS SEVEN TIMES Do you think this is going to help his aggro on mobs? Yes he might proc 30 times a fight, but he might also never proc until group kicks him for having dex instead of BEING ABLE TO TANK----- You are completely attributing too much to the benefits of dex, and you are stripping away the point of warriors-to mitigate damage. TL;DR stop using memes "herptydurp" and stop being an idiot dex pusher. PS: Do you even warrior
__________________
| ||
|
#15
|
||||||||||||
|
![]() This is going to be a fun one!
Quote:
Quote:
The helm? He'll lose several AC and 2 strength to gain 9 dex. The cloak? If he is wearing werewolf skin cloak, he'll be gaining several AC and a whopping 13 dex while losing 3 str and 3 stam. The face? Loses a couple ac and a few str to gain several dex. The rings? He loses several AC and 110 hp to gain 10 str and 10 dex. He's giving up things that he already has a TON of (hp and stam) and only a few AC in order to gain a few str and a bunch of dex. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You need to stop talking about these breakpoint-ish numbers, because they don't mean anything. So what if 83 dex is a large number and it gives a "not terrible" .5 ppm increase? The OP doesn't need to gain 83 dex in order to see a boost in his ppm. And just because dex and procs are a random thing doesn't mean that they should be ignored, or put on a low priority, when your entire class is based around keeping aggro with these mechanics. Quote:
Quit ranting about how dex and procs are random. We know. That's how warriors are built! Do you think any warrior who is worth anything on this server is out there rocking 70 unbuffed dex just because he is annoyed at how procs work? Quote:
Quote:
And then I told you to take your hertpydurp elsewhere. Quote:
What level is your warrior, Aim? Wanna come try to tank for my rogue with your strength-capped, monster AC, monster HP warrior who uses two wurmies to try to tank in HS/seb? I'll give you the straight facts on whether you tank better than every other warrior I've grouped with since 50. Ya know, all those other ogres who wear dex gear and are swinging ykesha weps and sarnak warhammers and silken whips and all. | |||||||||||
|
#16
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
You are arguing so much with me about how you think dex has such a minimal effect on keeping aggro unless you have hundreds of dex, and you are saying that str to do more damage to keep aggro is the way to go, but then you tell the OP to get two proccing weapons to keep aggro. By your own reasoning, the procs will be so random and infrequent that they won't help him keep aggro, ESPECIALLY SINCE HE HAS FREAKING 70 DEX, plus the proccing weps this guy can afford are going to have pretty crappy ratios. But you think he should wield these with his str-, hp-, and ac-stacked warrior in order to keep aggro. Even though they don't do squat for damage and they they aren't going to proc much either. Do YOU even warrior? | |||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 08-25-2012 at 08:34 AM..
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
![]() You're gonna want lots more DEx if you're planning on using procs to hold your aggro. You've got a lammy and a GJBS, aside from a Wurmy + something decent offhand you've got some decent gear. Save for Mith Arms/Legs, good replacements to Crafted. My War's got near-full crafted suit and some of those pieces just flat out suck.
__________________
Samsams Gamjams - Halfling Warrior of <Maelstrom>
Maybach Music (retired bard, Part-Time Forumquest DJ) - Wood Elf Bard of <Vae Victis> Quote:
| |||
|
#18
|
||||
|
![]() Btw, I agree this is going to be a fun one.
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#19
|
|||
|
![]() Not up for proving your warrior choices work in game huh?
| ||
|
#20
|
|||
|
![]() If you gave a quick read around any forum, you'd know I'm currently playing a non-tank warrior. I am speaking from my (albeit hazy) memory as a tank during trilogy EQ live. Since then, I have also read extensively on different EQ warrior websites, or just stat information in general, and am making my views based on both of these basis.
I'm not going to argue with you further, this is quickly turning a newbie help thread into a RnF troll. We've both given our points, let the OP decide.
__________________
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|