![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
![]() Last I checked, only a couple classes are good at PL. Is every druid on the server recruiting their friends to play (and PL'ng them)? Anyone who has been uber knows the formula for EQ. Roll a druid; get it to max level then PL whatever toon(s) you really want.
| ||
Last edited by Arclanz; 08-30-2012 at 02:00 PM..
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#13
|
|||
|
![]() Guys come on now...you don't need to log on your "wife's" account to sit in EC with such things as this:- http://ahungry.com/eqauctions
As seen in the "two-boxing" thread stickied, I'm extremely anti-boxing because trying to get a group with my rogue and even cleric would be an even trickier task with anti-social boxers all over the place on the server. If you really want to play two accounts at once, do it positively and play 1 character on blue, 1 on red. Or pick another EQemu server, plenty there. | ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Druids? Strong PL, especially for lower levels. Clerics? As strong or stronger than druids depending on gear. Monks? Great for melees. Shadowknights? Good for melees. Necromancers? Great for anyone, even at 55+. Magicians? Great for melees. Shamans? Great for melees. Bards? Great for casters with PBAOE. Hell. Even enchanters could be a great PL all the way to 60, and for any class, with some more-or-less fancy charming tactics. People just think druids are the only option for PL because they are used to getting a DS and regrowth at tunnel and think that because they can then own level 10 mobs in EC, a druid must be the best PL ever. Also, leveling a druid to 50+ just so you can then PL other characters is incredibly stupid. Jesus. | |||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 08-30-2012 at 02:25 PM..
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Orruar <Trump> - 60 cleric - P2002
| |||
|
#16
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#17
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Good job here.
__________________
| |||
|
#18
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
fixt
__________________
| |||
|
#19
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
A - Rolls a soloable class (probably not a cleric or tank unless they're extra committed) B - Leaves the server. So in fact, by opening up P99 to boxers might water down the existing 'real' population (I know I'd quit for THF or something) and then you have the R99 situation where nobody logs in because the server population is already so low and the experience essentially is logging on, putting on LFG for a while, then giving up. The underlying point is that boxing isn't allowed, and it should stay that way - or scrap R99 and make it a blue "boxing allowed" server. | ||||
|
#20
|
|||
|
![]() The whole 2 boxing issue to me doesn't hold water. Sure if you can roll a monk/shaman combo or something similar and duo you can. But in my EQ live experiences most of the groups I actually got into were functioning purely because there was someone 2 boxing a cleric or tank that was vital to starting the group in the first place.
I'm sure it would be different now then it was after 15+ expansions on live, but it isn't lightyears difference. We all know to have a good functioning group you need a tank, a healer, and a puller. Well what are the things you are looking for the most to hold a group together or form one? A tank and a healer. Spent a ton of time with people boxing characters and got great exp I would have never gotten sitting LFG waiting for a "legit" group to form up. Sure there will be 2 boxing camps for items, but most camps are already solo'd by 60s that are important. | ||
|
![]() |
|
|