Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-13-2009, 03:58 PM
Kaleadar Kaleadar is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halladar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You then have to run naked through N. Ro, Oasis, S. Ro, Innothule, Upper Guk (maybe the froggies hate you, depends on your frog killing habits), and whatever in L. guk is between your zone in and where you died.
LOL and this has changed when? You have ALWAYS had to do this. Every once in a blue moon you could get your corpse dragged to a cleric EXPing and pay them 30plat for a rez to save you the run and EXP loss.

Also everquest has some on the largest time sinks to date. The whole point of the game was to have things take a lot of time to slow the player down.

Everquest is one of the most challenging MMO's. There is a reason that only 1 - 2 end game guilds existed per server, and everyone else was 2 expansions behind.
  #12  
Old 11-13-2009, 05:44 PM
Wonton Wonton is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 409
Default

Oh... My... God...
__________________
[ANONYMOUS]
  #13  
Old 11-13-2009, 08:14 PM
Throttle Throttle is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 11
Default

The lawsuit didn't actually have anything to do with TorilMUD.

Back in 1991 or something, a group of people at Copenhagen University created DIKU. It was a MUD, a text-based game vaguely similar to any given MMORPG, and it was so popular that they released the source code in the form of a DIKU stock that anyone could download and build their own MUD around. It was nothing more than the foundation of a game, barely playable until re-designed, and it was free to use and modify in any way you liked provided that you did not make money from it.

TorilMUD (previously Sojourn, Sojourn II etc.) was a DIKU-based MUD, and Brad McQuaid played there. Toril was very popular at the time and had hundreds of players, so Brad got the idea to adapt the concept into a graphical game. The owners of Toril agreed to let him do this, and so he created Everquest. The similarities between Toril and EQ at the time were huge, from classes and races being almost identical to the gameplay being pretty much the same. The only real major difference is the actual game world as Toril is set in the Forgotten Realms setting which is the intellectual property of Wizards of the Coast. TorilMUD is still running to this date, however it is a shadow of its former glory in this generation of WoW and all that.

Since Brad McQuaid's source of inspiration was a DIKU-based MUD, EQ shared obvious similarities with various elements incorporated in most MUDs. However, while they were primarily just similarities that are now considered standard elements in all MMORPGS, a few things were identical, most importantly the stock emotes. Even though these were fairly inconsequential to gameplay, the fact that they were mostly copy-pasted from the DIKU stock caused some concern that more than just the text echoes from /smile and /yawn etc. had been appropriated from the DIKU code.

Since the DIKU source was freeware with the condition that you make no profits from whatever product you modify it into, it turned into a legal case (although I don't think it was the owners of DIKU who initiated it) which was eventually dropped as it turned out that nothing else had been used, and the stock emotes had been kept more for nostalgia's sake than to steal from the work of others. Since DIKU is 100% text-based, the source code would not even have been compatible with a graphical MMORPG to any relevant extent.
Last edited by Throttle; 11-13-2009 at 08:18 PM..
  #14  
Old 11-14-2009, 12:37 AM
Halladar Halladar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
Default

That certainly sounds plausible.

But how do you know this? What is your source of information?

I already knew about the race and class structure similarities. Personally I never played Torilmud, so I can't vouch for the rest of it.

But it seems to me I remember reading during the court case that parts of the database were lifted directly into the game. Things like what NPC's said and including quests. I never read exactly what these were but my impression was it was things like "You've ruined your own lands, you won't ruin mine." or "Natural selection at work."

You may be right. Parts of that story sound pretty fishy though. The TorilMud folks just out of the kindness of their hearts let a large multinational corporation develop a game based on their work? Which incidentally was a branch of another groups work?

(Note: I just looked this up on wikipedia, so I hope this is accurate. According to the wiki I read Verant was spun off from Sony at the end of 1998, and before this was a branch of Sony. EQ was released March 16, 1999 so for most of the development was directly a Sony operation.)

I dunno about this. I'm working off memory a lot here as I followed what I saw in the press about the case, but didn't save the stories. I seem to remember it was settled out of court and the records sealed but I may be wrong.

Exactly how do you know what you say?

And as to the rest of the comments people have made, well it's an old argument. But it is still valid and it was never properly addressed in old EQ.

With a small server population you are going to see these issues moreso than original with it's huge server populations at the time.

Also one other thing, "Since DIKU is 100% text-based, the source code would not even have been compatible with a graphical MMORPG to any relevant extent."

I totally disagree with this statement. At least as regards this particular game. It pretty much is a text based mud with a gui and some very rudimentary collision detection.
  #15  
Old 11-14-2009, 12:54 AM
Halladar Halladar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Just an addendum about the source code thing. I think you could use it to some extent with this game. I kind of doubt they put it directly in the game, but you'll never know unless you had a copy of the EQ engine to compare it to the original mud code.

Specifically what I am thinking of is the database of NPC's, quests, mobs, the sort of thing that define the world you have.

It really shouldn't be mysterious. Somewhere out there is a copy of the MUD McQuaid played and any number of others that may have been used. Or maybe someone here played the same MUD back in the day.

I dunno. But just reading through the database ought to answer a lot of questions.

Of course I didn't play it, and I don't have the database.
  #16  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:13 AM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halladar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you just might get it.

This is going to be a little long winded, so I hope someone bears with me long enough for me to communicate my points.

Look I started EQ in 2000. I played off and on for a few years, mostly off but the game had a magic pre-POP that I haven't experienced in any other game. As to why I was an intermittent player, the main reason is the time sink the game basically is. It would take a lot more time than I have here to explain the pleasure and the frustration I got from this game. If you are reading this, odds are you played in the beginning, and hopefully understand.

Okay, the game was magic. I think it was despite Verant (and Smedley and McQuaid). My belief is because the game was basically a torilmud with a gui, not the sheer talent of the Verant people. Some of those people did a good job (the art people did wonders considering the tech they had to work with then), but this game was successful despite them, not because of them.

I might add, that there was a court case in the early 2000's between sony and the Torilmud (or was it Dikumud) folks. The claim being that large portions of the database (and world definition I guess) was pirated from the MUD game. Anyway you never heard much of it after sony settled, and you don't see much when you google it, but I've formed my opinion.

Okay, let me state something that is a belief of mine:

Everquest shipped in 1999 without a melee combat system. Obviously mobs hit you, and you hit mobs but it was a very basic thing. I don't think they implemented whatever they had in mind, and it is something that has been bandaided in live over the course of 10 years, but has never been fixed.

In the world of EQ 1999 stats do nothing. (I don't know how it works with EQ Emu) but in the beginning they did squat. Stamina gave you hp's. Int/Wis gave you mana. Charisma gave you a little better price with the vendor and may have helped faction. Strength is important for toting stuff and wearing bronze armor, but it doesn't do squat in combat (max hit damage, and very minimal at that) except for rogues. Agility is important to keep above 75 and the sharp AC drop, other than that it does nothing. Dex helps you learn skills quicker (remember no crits in 1999), and well you are going to max them anyway with all the time you spend levelling.

AC. Geez there was a post in this forum with a link to the soft cap/class thing. That whole thing was ridiculously convoluted. Further evidence to me that Verant didn't know what it was doing when it made this combat system.

Okay, those are all opinions. But like many of you I was around in the old days. A lot of you guys will remember Romidar Trueblade and Ruatha and the parses they and others made trying to figure out the melee system. This system was flawed from the beginning.

Okay this server uses EQ Emu code. A second hand implementation (could very well be better than the code they use on live; that isn't the point though) of a system that was screwed up originally.

You are wondering where I am going to go with this, so I'll spell it out now:

The melee/caster issue imbalance issue has been in EQ since the beginning, and is going to be a big deal here.

Bigger in fact. In my "salad" days in EQ, server populations were usually anywhere from 1500-2000. For the old world. Now you have maybe 300 on this server if you are very lucky?

You've already had threads about caster pets vs. warriors. Already had threads about people rerolling casters. I havent' seen them yet, but I'm sure the solo/useless without a group thing will pop up. The sheer cumbersomeness of playing a melee without gate or bind.

With low population it gets much harder for melee. Looking for someone to give you a bind, heal you, port you around, invis you so you can get somewhere to xp to begin with.

Over the years these kinds of things were addressed in live by the PoK books, souldbinders, item inflation. I guess it kind of works now, especially since there are no true noobies in live anymore.

But you guys don't have these things.

An example of something. Usually pre-kunark most people on the server in the level 40 were trying for a lower guk or Sol B group. A few oddballs with established groups may have gone to Perma or Mistmoore. Even fewer may have done Kedge if they had a really reliable group.

Let's say you are a human warrior with bad vision. You are bound in freeport (although I guess you could have bound in Arena). Your party wipes or you are killed in Lower Guk without a cleric in the group. You then have to run naked through N. Ro, Oasis, S. Ro, Innothule, Upper Guk (maybe the froggies hate you, depends on your frog killing habits), and whatever in L. guk is between your zone in and where you died.

Is it any wonder anyone would play a caster? Or say the group is breaking up. You are deep in L. Guk and you can't gate out. What do you do then?

Look I could go on and on about this stuff. Most people have seen the arguments before.

But that doesn't mean the issue isn't still there. What is covered up in live because you can go to the bazaar and buy gear that level 50's that raided for a year couldn't dream of in original EQ, doesn't change the problem with what you are trying to do here.

Like most people I have some ideas about how things should have been, but they would require some fundamental changes to the system at a basic level. But I think you are going to have to address things now. I mean you can easily see the all caster guild with a couple twink tanks not need any warriors (or paladins or sk's). Usual drill some monks, rogues depending on how their damage plays out...

Anyway not trying to be a downer, but I'm not sure how successful this whole concept is going to be.
You know I kind of think you're right, but I'll leave it at that. We glorify the classic days because of how we depended on each other more, but we also do our best to overlook its flaws.

(Is it possible that a warrior bound in freeport that wants to hunt in guk could get faction with oggok so they could bind in feerot or something? Is there a workaround so they don't have to cross several zones?)
Last edited by stormlord; 11-14-2009 at 01:23 AM..
  #17  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:18 AM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnPublic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This concept is already successful. It's not about replicating the original EQ because it was a perfect game, it's about replicating it because it was a great game. Things aren't handed to you. Things are difficult. Things are more rewarding.

My friends and I have had a blast the past week running around the newbie zones and hitting the low level dungeons again. I can't count the number of times we've rediscovered something and said "Oh yeah! This game was so awesome!"

We are looking forward to reliving the great dungeons and challenges present in the game before the challenge was completely sucked out.
Want to trade attitudes? I'd love to have yours!
Last edited by stormlord; 11-14-2009 at 01:22 AM..
  #18  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:28 AM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Villide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think JohnPublic makes a great point - the server is already a success. Arguably, it's been the most popular EQ emu server going (based on unique characters accessing the server).

If the challenges of original Everquest forced interaction and grouping, this server will do the same thing even moreso.

Point of fact - I've been playing a Paladin since the server came out of beta, and it's been a hell of a struggle just getting to level 11, since I mostly solo due to limited playtime. But the struggle has been a great deal of fun as well, as it's challenged my playing ability - I can't just mash keys in combat or run wherever the hell I want. And I know I can't just head down to the bottom of Blackburrow and expect to have someone come pull my corpse out. I've gathered and turned in so many gnoll fangs, I can't run through Qeynos anymore without looking for the corrupt Qeynos guards, making bank runs a bit scarier. My actions have a direct effect on my character's existence within Norrath - both good and bad.

So I know that if I do get stuck in a bad situation - I'd better have a pretty deep friends list to call on. And that's why, even though I can't group much, I try to help my fellow players as often as possible. I buff the newbies, I've given away about a half dozen decent weapons I couldn't equip but acquired questing, and I've helped on a few corpse runs. So when the time comes, I'll hopefully be able to get the help I need. My guess is that many other players are doing the same thing.

IMO that's how this server will survive over the long haul.

Is the game hard right now for a melee? Hell yes it is - for this Paladin anyways. But I'm having a great time figuring out how to stay alive and maybe gathering a little experience while I do. And that's more than I've gotten from any other EQ Emu server (or even Live over the last 5 years or so for that matter).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCAjmuA1HDk
  #19  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:32 AM
Halladar Halladar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
Default

"(Is it possible that a warrior bound in freeport that wants to hunt in guk could get faction with oggok so they could bind in feerot or something? Is there a workaround so they don't have to cross several zones?)"

I grouped with a wood elf ranger once that bound in grobb. Of course he could sneak and hide, and camo. He had some spot in there that was safe to spawn in. If anything happened he just memmed spells and sat till he was ready to go.

You might be able to get faction with some of the oggok guys. I think there was a quest with one of the merchants outside oggok that you could work.

Over and over and over again. If you killed dorf guards you might have gotten faction with one of the oggok factions as well, I can't remember.

Offhand I dont' think I've ever heard of anyone getting faction with grobb that couldn't stroll in there. Maybe because no one bothered really after it got easy to get around, and L. Guk wasn't the spot most of the 40+ crowd tried for after Kunark.

Remember the 'sneak' feature and quests made some things easier. And god knows everyone had lots of time to run these faction quests hundreds of times if you were picking up the items as you xp'ed or bought stacks of bone chips.
  #20  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:40 AM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halladar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"(Is it possible that a warrior bound in freeport that wants to hunt in guk could get faction with oggok so they could bind in feerot or something? Is there a workaround so they don't have to cross several zones?)"

I grouped with a wood elf ranger once that bound in grobb. Of course he could sneak and hide, and camo. He had some spot in there that was safe to spawn in. If anything happened he just memmed spells and sat till he was ready to go.

You might be able to get faction with some of the oggok guys. I think there was a quest with one of the merchants outside oggok that you could work.

Over and over and over again. If you killed dorf guards you might have gotten faction with one of the oggok factions as well, I can't remember.

Offhand I dont' think I've ever heard of anyone getting faction with grobb that couldn't stroll in there. Maybe because no one bothered really after it got easy to get around, and L. Guk wasn't the spot most of the 40+ crowd tried for after Kunark.

Remember the 'sneak' feature and quests made some things easier. And god knows everyone had lots of time to run these faction quests hundreds of times if you were picking up the items as you xp'ed or bought stacks of bone chips.
If enough people play in GUK, there's a chance one of em will be a caster that can port. If you bound outside in the swamps, and wanted to get to freeport you could get a port to commonlands. This is assuming that there're so many people in guk that getting a port isn't hard. Otherwise, you'd have to run. If someone was going to routinely go to guk, they'd probably get a bind outside. Here again, though, how are they going to bank??? How are they going to sell??? (that's, without running across several zones)
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.