Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 05-23-2010, 04:42 AM
Morndenkainen Morndenkainen is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 74
Default

On another note, howabout we all e-mail the guy who created EQ, and beg him to explain the system now that he's had a break with sony and verant? That'd put all the rumors to rest, and who knows, he might even decide to play on the server....
  #192  
Old 05-23-2010, 03:36 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

LOL I love how this retard makes up a formula and goes "oh its classic!"
  #193  
Old 05-23-2010, 05:27 PM
girth girth is offline
Fire Giant

girth's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas, Y'all
Posts: 793
Default

1 - I doubt any one person made the early melee system
2 - at least he's trying president [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Girth Matters (Retired)
50 Ogre Shadow Knight

Mugatoo <Center For Ants>
45 Iksar Monk

"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas."
  #194  
Old 05-23-2010, 06:08 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Hes still basing this off his memory and not any proof. His main point is he "remembers soloing up to level 23," which although stupid, could have been done over a long period of time. As Haynar stated, Melee was actually hitting "too much" off of the data he has. I don't find the miss rate out of the ordinary, I remember being pissed as fucking at low levels 10 years ago missing constantly. Haynar stated he believes there is a problem with AC (which I think most people have been aware of) that he has been working on for a long time. I also, as do many others, think there is an issue with how often mobs hit players, and the damage they do, though I don't care enough to investigate as I feel the game plays well in its current state. If Haynar is able to work out AC, and mob vs player damage/AC mitigation is worked out, then I think the OP may have an easier chance "soloing to level 23." It appears to me the OP had trouble doing what he believed he did 10 years ago and jumped straight to the conclusion that it HAD to be a PC miss rate issue, rather then AC/Mob hit rate.
  #195  
Old 05-23-2010, 06:15 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

I'll double check some values, but I think when I found the way to tweak the melee values that I still left it actually short of what the rest of the emulator uses (Yep, I'm a dick =D). I'm on the process of recalculating AC's around the raid content and I can tell you that it is WAY off and most likely is the extra 2-3% over we're seeing AND the missing amount that I left for tweaking in the DB.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
  #196  
Old 05-23-2010, 06:27 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeolwind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll double check some values, but I think when I found the way to tweak the melee values that I still left it actually short of what the rest of the emulator uses (Yep, I'm a dick =D). I'm on the process of recalculating AC's around the raid content and I can tell you that it is WAY off and most likely is the extra 2-3% over we're seeing AND the missing amount that I left for tweaking in the DB.
I gotta be honest Aeol... I've read this paragraph a few times and am not *quite* certain what you are talking about. Any chance you can expand upon this?
  #197  
Old 05-23-2010, 06:57 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I gotta be honest Aeol... I've read this paragraph a few times and am not *quite* certain what you are talking about. Any chance you can expand upon this?
Ok, there is a rule value that controls hit/miss rate at a variable level. Way back when it was WAY off, I tweaked it up. Problem improved a great deal. Based on what the "baseline" is for emulators there is still another I think 3% hit left in that variable we could go up.

Now, AC is totally fubar, pretty much around every mob. It was arbitrarily set either by us, or by someone else that created the mob.

Haynar said melee were hitting about 2-3% too much. Now, that means that AC is in the range of 2-3% relatively speaking. Now, couple that with the fact that the melee value is already 3% lower than what it should be, would mean that the actual value AC is off is about 6% relatively speaking.

In other words, if we tweak mob AC up right, we still have some wiggle room in variables to tweak players back in line if it swings too far the other way.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
  #198  
Old 05-23-2010, 07:11 PM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

So is Haynar saying we are doing 2-3% too much damage in our hits, or we are connecting with the mob 2-3% too often? I guess they could still be related as far as overall difficulty goes, but I did not think AC had anything to do with miss/dodge/parry/etc.
  #199  
Old 05-23-2010, 07:36 PM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

EQ has never had a good combat system. They basically threw it together trying to base it on D&D.

As far as my hit rate, I haven't noticed problems. Although I swear I was getting hit a lot when looting my corpse and that I got hit less and less until I was fully equipped. I know that's unrelated to pc hit rate.

And you know, generally, a combat system could have it where a mob hits you everytime and you hit the mob everytime, but neither would hit the other very hard. There's no universal law that says you have to miss or hit a certain way. A system is broke when it implicates a = b, but in reality, a != b. Otherwise, bleh.

The #1 thing I care about, as a player and a programmer and a gamer, is that I can work to change the outcome of events (like combat). Whether this is through learning about stats or items and changing them or, in general, changing the conditions of the fight, like when I run or when I attack or when I cast a spell, without my ability to change it then I am merely audience to a random number generator with no control whatsoever. I think random number generators add an element of realism to events that make them more believable, but without proper control mechanisms and forethought about how the player and the game come together, it can very quickly go from being a game to simply being a movie you watch where you're not participating.
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.

Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109
P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48
P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59

"Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter."
Last edited by stormlord; 05-23-2010 at 08:01 PM..
  #200  
Old 05-23-2010, 08:25 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So is Haynar saying we are doing 2-3% too much damage in our hits, or we are connecting with the mob 2-3% too often? I guess they could still be related as far as overall difficulty goes, but I did not think AC had anything to do with miss/dodge/parry/etc.
Connecting 2-3% too much. AC affects damage dealt and frequency of max hits....it also does/can affect hit rate. A miss is not always a miss, sometimes it is a hit that glances off your armor. I could also be a thousand miles off the mark, but I discovered the AC "problem" while working in Sky. It was definitely evident. And by it being so out of whack, a lot of mobs were literally loot pinatas offering virtually no challenge, strikingly similar to now but surprisingly worse.

Hopefully, I'll be able to get the raid combat stuff tweaked around eventually to rectify that.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.