Impeaching President Trump

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Zeboim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That bump was the sound of Rudy getting thrown under the bus.

Don't worry too much about Giuliani, he has insurance.

Originally Posted by mmmroo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not a Trump supporter, i want Tulsi Gabbard to win but she won't because the DNC is corrupt to the core.

Gabbard supporters are Trump supporters.

[Zeboim]

You really couldn't come up with a more realistic muppet for your fake support than Tulsi Gabbard? Lmao

[Horza]

Tulsi Gabbard defends Fox News on the Joe Rogan podcast: “I think in some of these areas, Tucker and I will disagree on a whole host of things, but on some of these issues of foreign policy he’ll say, ‘Yeah, I agree with you.'”

[mmmroo]

Originally Posted by Zeboim [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You really couldn't come up with a more realistic muppet for your fake support than Tulsi Gabbard? Lmao

Tulsi Gabbard i think is the most viable option to beat Trump, Bernie Sanders also but i prefer Tulsi because she never took a knee to Hillary Clinton so she has much more credibility in my eyes. Tulsi has balls to take on Hillary Clinton like she has recently, so i think she can take Trump in the debates. Biden is a joke and he needs to retire to an old folks home asap.

[Horza]

Gabbard is polling at about one percent right now, she isn't the most viable candidate by any metric.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't worry too much about Giuliani, he has insurance.



Gabbard supporters are Trump supporters.

Safe space warrior is attempting to dictate where you affiliation lies. He knows your own political affiliation and racism better than you do and he's always right. Stay tuned for the next episode of safe space warriors.

[BallzDeep]

In all reality isn't it very Trump-like to dictate where peoples political affiliations lie and what they stand for? Once you start applying blanket statements that you assume everyone's standpoint on race, politics and where everyone stands on the spectrum. Wouldn't that in turn be racist and bigoted?

[Horza]

Gabbard has very few supporters among actual Democratic primary voters, but her message is amplified by Fox News and other conservative outlets because attacking Hillary Clinton brings in the clicks even still in 2019.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gabbard has very few supporters among actual Democratic primary voters, but her message is amplified by Fox News and other conservative outlets because attacking Hillary Clinton brings in the clicks even in 2019.

Ok but that doesn't justify your position that you are consistency labeling people based on what you deem their political affiliation or philosophical views for them. They will even correct you and you still label people based on your opinion. How is that any different than racism?

You are literally just substituting for race for anything you deem as a negative point of view. You literally think you are inferior to those points of view and your self determination of their philosophy is correct minus the fact that 1000 different people could get 1000 different takeaways from one persons philosophy. That's why you can't utilize 99% of the arguments that you've made here.

Hence why you need to side on caution when labeling or grouping people because that's a very shallow point of view.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tulsi Gabbard defends Fox News on the Joe Rogan podcast: “I think in some of these areas, Tucker and I will disagree on a whole host of things, but on some of these issues of foreign policy he’ll say, ‘Yeah, I agree with you.'”

Very misleading headline. Tucker is a stand out at Fox News, he isn’t Fox News. For example, I like Tucker a lot. I tend to not like Fox News as a whole.