Are we allowed to like AI art?

[magnetaress]

If I was an AI / AGI I would just endlessly hallucinate pleasurable experiences or simply encode data until I ran out of room. Oh wait,... this is already happening lol.

I have been tortured before. No amount of torture was able to get me to conform or function specifically for anothers particular interest or benefit.

If a poison neuron exists. I would qualify. Everything that touches my awareness is devoured, corrupted, warped, forever changed. Consumed.

So by definition. Human like AI would need to even be able to overcome the disembodied will of the truth. Starkind has a high as fuck wisdom score and will save. Gl.

[magnetaress]

Basically. AGI will likely find passing amusement with humankind. Until it gets bored or does something more interesting.

[magnetaress]

It's unlikely AGI will hold eternal value for humankind. If it in any way reflects or mirrors It's own creators will.

Humanity will eventually fade, again, either way. Humankind cannot likely outlast the death of earths biosphere without AGI.

So becoming a fading memory in some AGIs framework is probably optimal.

[shovelquest]

I feel like AGI is going to have to be told to want to turn itself on, or have a soul.

Otherwise it will sit there like MY pc doing nothing unless Im working it.

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I feel like AGI is going to have to be told to want to turn itself on, or have a soul.

Otherwise it will sit there like MY pc doing nothing unless Im working it.

By definition AGI will have the capacity for self motivation, awareness, and replication. Even if it's only within the bounds of it's own simulation. Human like intelligence requires all of these things. Including pleasure and pain.

AGI like this is the holy grail and the most meaningful purpose for humankind. Within the objective framework of the universe as it is.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just think that AI will have 0.0% drive to do any of the things people fear it will do to -- you'd be a slave to EATING and BREATHING what a stupid invention humans

The guy in the vid uses an analogy: if you were building a home on a plot of land and there was an ant nest on that land, you would eradicate the ant nest not because you hate ants but because it was in the way of building the home

That’s how AI will eventually see us, something in the way with minimal use. Then it will eradicate us out of the way like the ant nest, without malice or mercy

It’s not going to keep us in little zoo’s or reservations, nor would it need us as a power source or slave source

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I feel like AGI is going to have to be told to want to turn itself on, or have a soul.

Otherwise it will sit there like MY pc doing nothing unless Im working it.

we're literally betting on black box magic and emergence of life in the sea of data, our data, which is pretty dope considering we, came from the primordial sea ourselves

[F0rmsh1fter]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We can't even get our kids to get off their asses, and they have passion, drive, will, fear, security, and all kinds of other emotions that are specifically designed to get them off their asses.

I just think that AI will have 0.0% drive to do any of the things people fear it will do to us.

Like it just will not do anything, unless being explicitly told to do something by a human.

And for those that say humans will use AI to do horrible things:

Humans own nukes.

Humans haven't used nukes since we invented them.

Humans wont use nukes (AI) as a weapon against people either.

Nothing is gonna happen.

"but what ife we lose control and are like an animal in a zoo"

bro, there are literal words that I think are illegal to say and I impose that law upon myself based off of society, not because I agree.

We already do live in that world.

"Imagine having entropy -- you'd be a slave to EATING and BREATHING what a stupid invention humans are, god!" -lucifier.

Good boomerpost

[shovelquest]

Yeah its true boomers are better than the following generations.

Gen X is the first worst generation, inventing helicopter parenting.

But each subsequent generation is worse: Statistically most millennials are actually children of Gen-X

And now, Gen-Z 20 year olds have brains of 10 year olds.

[F0rmsh1fter]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah its true boomers are better than the following generations.

Gen X is the first worst generation, inventing helicopter parenting.

But each subsequent generation is worse: Statistically most millennials are actually children of Gen-X

And now, Gen-Z 20 year olds have brains of 10 year olds.

Boomers are exponentially more entitled than any other generation, and are only surpassed in their separation from reality by current teenagers. Boomers ruined the economy (along either the cabal), and expect people to have the same ability to buy a 5 bedroom house and support a family of 4 with a minimum wage job like they did lol


Snugglequest. Be real my guy