Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[TomisFeline]

do you think the fact that we are in a recession changes the quality of these posts, or the general cadence of the thread?

[eqravenprince]

I could deal with DSM all day every day over the insults and general rude behavior. If I ever want to prove the earth was flat, I want DSM on my side of the debate. He provides a shit ton of data which takes a ton of time. He provides different perspectives (although some say moving the goalpost). I think since my post is general, then there was never a goalpost to begin with. Best is whatever you personally think best means.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I could deal with DSM all day every day over the insults and general rude behavior. If I ever want to prove the earth was flat, I want DSM on my side of the debate. He provides a shit ton of data which takes a ton of time. He provides different perspectives (although some say moving the goalpost). I think since my post is general, then there was never a goalpost to begin with. Best is whatever you personally think best means.

Howdy VQ guildy, +5 dkp to you sir

[eqravenprince]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Howdy VQ guildy, +5 dkp to you sir

You are proving my point. I only know of him from the p99 forum. This is the type of snarky response I was expecting from the crowd that's been insulting him.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are proving my point. I only know of him from the p99 forum. This is the type of snarky response I was expecting from the crowd that's been insulting him.

+10 dkp

[cd288]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I could deal with DSM all day every day over the insults and general rude behavior. If I ever want to prove the earth was flat, I want DSM on my side of the debate. He provides a shit ton of data which takes a ton of time. He provides different perspectives (although some say moving the goalpost). I think since my post is general, then there was never a goalpost to begin with. Best is whatever you personally think best means.

I mean sure I would love DSM on my side of the debate too, because it means he will never admit to being wrong and will just act like water on a rock lol. And when one of his arguments is proven wrong he just switches...see the argument about DPS which went from "Shamans are better DPS than Mages and none of you can/have provide(d) data showing that they're not" to "oh someone provided data showing that they're not...well them being better DPS is irrelevant anyways!!!!"

It's a joke lol

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I could deal with DSM all day every day over the insults and general rude behavior.

You have not provided - and you cannot provide - evidence that others are being insulting and rude and that - by the same measure - DSM is not.

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I ever want to prove the earth was flat, I want DSM on my side of the debate.

I am not sure what point you think you are making here, but thank you for confirming you would like to have DSM on your side to argue for infactual/incorrect positions that are contrary to reality, such as that the earth is flat.

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He provides a shit ton of data which takes a ton of time.

You have provided no evidence for how long DSM spends collecting data, and you have admitted that you would want DSM on your side to argue for infactual/incorrect positions that are contrary to reality, such as that the earth is flat. Data that is false and/or irrelevant is not significant or relevant to this (or any) discussion, nor is the amount of time required to gather said false or irrelevant data.

Originally Posted by eqravenprince [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He provides different perspectives (although some say moving the goalpost). I think since my post is general, then there was never a goalpost to begin with. Best is whatever you personally think best means.

Why should anybody who is interested in discussing reality care about "different perspectives" when those perspectives are false such as that the earth is flat or that a Shaman will provide more DPS than a Mage in a high level fast-paced killing DPS group?

[eqravenprince]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have not provided - and you cannot provide - evidence that others are being insulting and rude and that - by the same measure - DSM is not.

You can find insult(s) at DSM on just about every page. But why should I provide evidence, when DSM does, he just gets insulted more.

[eqravenprince]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not sure what point you think you are making here, but thank you for confirming you would like to have DSM on your side to argue for infactual/incorrect positions that are contrary to reality, such as that the earth is flat.

I want someone who is open minded and takes time to question the norm with actual data. What harm is there in that.

[eqravenprince]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why should anybody who is interested in discussing reality care about "different perspectives" when those perspectives are false such as that the earth is flat or that a Shaman will provide more DPS than a Mage in a high level fast-paced killing DPS group?

I'll shut up about DSM if you can find a single post where he says Shamans provide more DPS than a Mage. His point is it is not that big of a difference in DPS of Mage vs Shaman, plus you get all the extras a shaman provide over a mage. It's not that hard to understand what DSM is saying.