Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 11-03-2016, 11:48 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,324
Default

Up we go.

Danth
  #212  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:37 AM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by koros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Huh? Unless the effect of defense is astonishingly small, establishing a 95% confidence interval would definitely not take thousands of hits. Also a paired t-test or regression could make it even easier.
Well, you can establish a CI with any number of samples. The problem is shrinking it. I've been gradually putzing around there, and you can see that even with some hundreds of samples the CIs are quite large, assuming I implemented the Wilson Interval correctly.

A glimmering drake [] vs Loin [Various]
Samples: 437
Cooldown: 1.326
Defended: 12.4 - 16.7 (90%, average 14.4, 63 / 437)
Hit Rate: 48.6 - 54.8 (90%, average 51.7, 226 / 437)
Damage: 180 - 380
Per Hit: 233.9
Per Swing: 121.0
Min Hit: 18.0 - 24.9 (90%, average 21.2, 48 / 226)
Interval: 64.0 - 72.0 (90%, average 68.1, 154 / 226)
Max Hit: 8.3 - 13.5 (90%, average 10.6, 24 / 226)

A glimmering drake [] vs Sakuragi [Various]
Samples: 1410
Cooldown: 1.306
Defended: 14.2 - 16.7 (90%, average 15.4, 217 / 1410)
Hit Rate: 34.7 - 38.0 (90%, average 36.3, 512 / 1410)
Damage: 180 - 396
Per Hit: 257.7
Per Swing: 93.6
Min Hit: 22.4 - 27.3 (90%, average 24.8, 127 / 512)
Interval: 70.5 - 75.5 (90%, average 73.0, 374 / 512)
Max Hit: 1.5 - 3.1 (90%, average 2.1, 11 / 512)

Loin is in the early stages of gearing up (Champion's and not much in his other slots), so Sakuragi is probably 100-150 AC (displayed) ahead, yet even with 2000 total samples the 90% CIs (not even the 95% CIs) already overlap for min hits for example.
  #213  
Old 11-04-2016, 03:31 PM
koros koros is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, you can establish a CI with any number of samples. The problem is shrinking it. I've been gradually putzing around there, and you can see that even with some hundreds of samples the CIs are quite large, assuming I implemented the Wilson Interval correctly.

A glimmering drake [] vs Loin [Various]
Samples: 437
Cooldown: 1.326
Defended: 12.4 - 16.7 (90%, average 14.4, 63 / 437)
Hit Rate: 48.6 - 54.8 (90%, average 51.7, 226 / 437)
Damage: 180 - 380
Per Hit: 233.9
Per Swing: 121.0
Min Hit: 18.0 - 24.9 (90%, average 21.2, 48 / 226)
Interval: 64.0 - 72.0 (90%, average 68.1, 154 / 226)
Max Hit: 8.3 - 13.5 (90%, average 10.6, 24 / 226)

A glimmering drake [] vs Sakuragi [Various]
Samples: 1410
Cooldown: 1.306
Defended: 14.2 - 16.7 (90%, average 15.4, 217 / 1410)
Hit Rate: 34.7 - 38.0 (90%, average 36.3, 512 / 1410)
Damage: 180 - 396
Per Hit: 257.7
Per Swing: 93.6
Min Hit: 22.4 - 27.3 (90%, average 24.8, 127 / 512)
Interval: 70.5 - 75.5 (90%, average 73.0, 374 / 512)
Max Hit: 1.5 - 3.1 (90%, average 2.1, 11 / 512)

Loin is in the early stages of gearing up (Champion's and not much in his other slots), so Sakuragi is probably 100-150 AC (displayed) ahead, yet even with 2000 total samples the 90% CIs (not even the 95% CIs) already overlap for min hits for example.
I think the problem here is this method assumes the distribution to be normal. This isn't the case with EQ. I think the better way to do this is to assign each hit to a 1-20 mapping within the damage interval and use a bootstrapping method. Also since these logs have different max hits, the drakes must be different level. This is going to skew things wildly.

The math behind the ac equation is probably pretty linear, so we can almost certainly use a lower level mob to determine an equation instead of hard to parse drakes.
  #214  
Old 11-05-2016, 12:23 AM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by koros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the problem here is this method assumes the distribution to be normal. This isn't the case with EQ. I think the better way to do this is to assign each hit to a 1-20 mapping within the damage interval and use a bootstrapping method. Also since these logs have different max hits, the drakes must be different level. This is going to skew things wildly.

The math behind the ac equation is probably pretty linear, so we can almost certainly use a lower level mob to determine an equation instead of hard to parse drakes.
The differing levels are definitely an issue, and I'm probably going to fix that at some point. Sakuragi's parse is actually a combination of multiple fights in an effort to increase sample size (low level glimmers are 180-380, high level are 196-396, and there are some in between I think).

I'm not sure what you mean by a normal distribution; I'm already removing the D20. Min hits in the first are 180, max hits are 380, and interval hits are all other hits. I did kind of mutilate the Wilson Interval by representing it as a binomial rather than a multinomial but my suspicion is that a bootstrap method wouldn't reduce the confidence interval massively. However, I'd be curious to see anything you come up with there.
  #215  
Old 11-08-2016, 04:18 PM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Back to page 1 with you!
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
  #216  
Old 11-17-2016, 12:29 AM
Atmas Atmas is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In the bushes outside your window
Posts: 1,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Back to page 1 with you!
__________________
60 Wixxor - Atmas
60 Paladin - Opmeter
54 Rogue - Ories
Some other toons
Formerly of TZ
  #217  
Old 11-17-2016, 09:21 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,719
Default

Can you imagine if bugs are like petitions and they work from the back?
  #218  
Old 11-18-2016, 02:43 AM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can you imagine if bugs are like petitions and they work from the back?
That was a very cruel and mean-spirited thing to say! All those sad knights out there with their nigh-useless discs, and you would deny them even the thin, tepid reward of their rightful Defense skill. You should be ashamed sir, ashamed!
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
  #219  
Old 11-25-2016, 03:20 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That was a very cruel and mean-spirited thing to say! All those sad knights out there with their nigh-useless discs, and you would deny them even the thin, tepid reward of their rightful Defense skill. You should be ashamed sir, ashamed!
P99 dead pool: Which happens first, server closes or knights get fixed?

Danth
  #220  
Old 11-28-2016, 05:05 AM
Fung_Quellious Fung_Quellious is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 11
Default

Been playing my SK and finally leveled him to 40th and just found out my Defense is stuck at 200.

Checking forums if its bugged or not and only to find out that its been bugged for a YEAR already and still havent been fixed?!?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.