Is warrior aggro greatly exaggerated?

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes they were. It's right there in the post where he tries to claim a trio with a Warrior will be able to exp better or lock down more Howling Stones targets than a trio with a Monk.

--------'You don't understand English or you are a liar, which one is it? You say it was his main arguments and then highlight things he said that have nothing to do with disc or taunt. Your cognitive skills are very concerning.

Monks take a bit less damage than Warriors (not counting discipline), plus they have Mend, and max HP is mostly irrelevant to group content.

---------Hp and ac are irrelevant to tanking efficiency? Okay so you don't even have a fundamental understanding of the game at all. This is embarrassing right here to suggest


No, it results in what's needed to kill some targets in the first place, since a great charm pet is more powerful than anything else in the game. Not every attempt will be successful but that's irrelevant to doing Challenge content.

----------You are daft enough to argue while forgetting the topic? This is about efficiency during xp, you apparently cant stay on topic

Complete Heal creates more longevity than having a 3rd Enchanter. You seem a bit lost.

----------Okay but with ur rediculous logic, u don't need a cleric because ench can heal pet to full anytime, u probably had no idea of this. Either way, 2 ench is gonna result in inevitable bad rng and prolonged med breaks so you are wrong again

Wonderful! Let's see how many of the hardest targets you can kill in a Trio that includes a Warrior. Here's the starting list of targets to work on:

---------At this point, this section here was simply just mental illness or something. I said you cant do what I can do as an enchanter, and u reply with labeling a bunch of raid mobs to trio? How about you actually read what you are responding to? Its hard to say if you are lying or that dumb, but the whole topic here was xp, why tf u naming tov mobs. You are insufferable low iq so I wont bother responding, im sure anyone with a couple brain cells knows ur full of shit here. Maybe stop lying and gaslighting and go back to kc where you live
Western Wastes (3) : Mav Sapara , Jen Sapara , Mraaka
Plane of Growth (3) : Prince Thirneg , Guardian of Tunare , Guardian of Tunare (each of the two counts)
Kael Drakkel (8) : Dlammaz Stormslayer , Vkjen Thunderslayer , Velden Dragonbane , Sentinel Othkel , Sentinel Dragonbane , Sentinel Demek , Klraggek the Slayer , Irrek Bloodfist
Temple of Veeshan (33) : An ancient tigerclaw racnar , A tigerclaw racnar , A racnar (Temple of Veeshan) , A fiery guardian , A shimmer drake , Ymmeln , Tavekalem , Midayor , Krigara , Grozzmel , Essedera , Casalen , Meldikor the Windchaser , Zed`Renzicd , Yendilor the Cerulean Wing , Velcra`Dron , Sarek`Relan , Rlinf`Tae , Nir`Tan , Lurian , Kedrak , Kal`Vunar , Gra`Vloren , Dktan`Nirsl , Degta`Glis , Carx`Vean , Bryrym , Wel`Wnas , Nelaarn the Ebon Claw , Belijor the Emerald Eye , Ajorek the Crimson Fang , Malteor Flamecaller , Zemm

*Kithicor Forest (1) : General V`ghera
*The Hole (2) : Master Yael , Nortlav the Scalekeeper
*Plane of Fear (3) : An enraged golem , Fright , Dread
*Plane of Sky (4) : Keeper of Souls , Bazzzazzt , A greater sphinx , Eye of Veeshan
*City of Mist (1) : Lhranc
*Timorous Deep (1) : Faydedar
*Veeshan's Peak (10) : ( A Furious Guardian Wurm , Guardian wurm , A mature flame protector , A mature frost protector ) - each counts twice, must kill at different spawn points, ( A Racnar x2 , A lava drake x2 ) - must fight two at the same time

[Naethyn]

I can solo black dire can your enchanter do that?

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by Naethyn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

War Clr Enc in the hole during my early days. https://youtu.be/s3D2OYdg3WU?si=9efjmaWHZpCzcZKO

What a bunch of ass kickers! This was an awesome video from a while ago, perfect illustration!! Enjoyed this thanks for sharing

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by Naethyn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can solo black dire can your enchanter do that?

I havent tried black dire

[Zuranthium]

Nitestroke you have some kind of mental health or communication issue, but if what you meant to say is you want to prove yourself as a solo Enchanter (very random given the discussion that's been going on), then there are tons of solo targets available, see the appropriate lists and make videos of your God tier kills if you want to be added to the Hall of Fame - https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=120 , https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...93&postcount=1

Originally Posted by Nitestroke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay but with ur rediculous logic, u don't need a cleric because ench can heal pet to full anytime, u probably had no idea of this.

No you can't heal a pet to full anytime. You can use the mem blur trick to let them heal 5% per tick but that takes time and obviously is not viable in a lot of combat situations.

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nitestroke you have some kind of mental health or communication issue, but if what you meant to say is you want to prove yourself as a solo Enchanter (very random given the discussion that's been going on), then there are tons of solo targets available, see the appropriate lists and make videos of your God tier kills if you want to be added to the Hall of Fame - https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=120 , https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...93&postcount=1



No you can't heal a pet to full anytime. You can use the mem blur trick to let them heal 5% per tick but that takes time and obviously is not viable in a lot of combat situations.

Yeah im not the one doing nothing but gaslighting and lying you sorry ass fool. And yes ench can heal pet, takes a min and mana free. There you are wrong again. Go back to kc and stop giving advice when you have nothing to offer. And yes, I can solo better than you cause all you know how to do is suck ass clearly

[Lampolo]

Zarumtum, try making a post where your not goalpost shifting or straw manning. That's all you do. Anyone following can see this

[greatdane]

There's nothing about warriors that make them useful in group content. Outside of defensive disc, a warrior is like 5% more tanky than a knight. Unless you're pulling for an AoE group or something, using defensive in group content is weird as fuck.

The tank's DPS is largely irrelevant and warriors aren't significantly better DPS than a knight unless using actual DPS weapons and discs, which is mutually exclusive with tanking. There's no scenario where there's some kind of benefit to having a warrior as the tank.

With a knight tank, you get unbreakable aggro from the first moment of every fight so everyone can do whatever they want without any risk of taking aggro. Warrior aggro isn't stable until at least one proc, and in some cases, one proc isn't even enough. On top of that, knights bring bits and pieces of utility. A warrior brings literally none whatsoever.

Assuming max dex and two weapons with aggro procs, a warrior procs every 20 seconds on average. That's how long into a fight it typically takes before a warrior has stable aggro. A knight has stable aggro from the moment the mob gets into spellcasting range. You can literally start slowing/nuking on incoming.

That's really all there is to the discussion.

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by greatdane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's nothing about warriors that make them useful in group content. Outside of defensive disc, a warrior is like 5% more tanky than a knight. Unless you're pulling for an AoE group or something, using defensive in group content is weird as fuck.

The tank's DPS is largely irrelevant and warriors aren't significantly better DPS than a knight unless using actual DPS weapons and discs, which is mutually exclusive with tanking. There's no scenario where there's some kind of benefit to having a warrior as the tank.

With a knight tank, you get unbreakable aggro from the first moment of every fight so everyone can do whatever they want without any risk of taking aggro. Warrior aggro isn't stable until at least one proc, and in some cases, one proc isn't even enough. On top of that, knights bring bits and pieces of utility. A warrior brings literally none whatsoever.

Assuming max dex and two weapons with aggro procs, a warrior procs every 20 seconds on average. That's how long into a fight it typically takes before a warrior has stable aggro. A knight has stable aggro from the moment the mob gets into spellcasting range. You can literally start slowing/nuking on incoming.

That's really all there is to the discussion.

Welcome! Another suboptimal tank here to try and save face!!! You're in good company here. Noone wants your crappy paladin sitting and medding constantly when warrior can function non stop. Nice math btw, not biased at all and totally accurate LOL!! Defensive is wierd? Okay you look like a tard here by saying that. Warriors aren't significantly better dps? Man you are practiced after in lying to yourself warriors get triple attack and paladins cant break thru a wet paper bag. Pally dps is non existent sorry mate. Love also how u act like pally gaurantees insta aggro, most of the time ur gonna get interrupted and stunned because pally are dogshit compared to ogre warrior but ok...You're only defense is unbreakable aggro from the start, and if ench is competent, that is not necessary at all. You are bringing up small points and ignoring the big ones. Have fun with that. Clearly u need time to cope lol. You newbs just keep floating to the surface after every flush its hilarious

[Nitestroke]

Originally Posted by greatdane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's nothing about warriors that make them useful in group content. Outside of defensive disc, a warrior is like 5% more tanky than a knight. Unless you're pulling for an AoE group or something, using defensive in group content is weird as fuck.

The tank's DPS is largely irrelevant and warriors aren't significantly better DPS than a knight unless using actual DPS weapons and discs, which is mutually exclusive with tanking. There's no scenario where there's some kind of benefit to having a warrior as the tank.

With a knight tank, you get unbreakable aggro from the first moment of every fight so everyone can do whatever they want without any risk of taking aggro. Warrior aggro isn't stable until at least one proc, and in some cases, one proc isn't even enough. On top of that, knights bring bits and pieces of utility. A warrior brings literally none whatsoever.

Assuming max dex and two weapons with aggro procs, a warrior procs every 20 seconds on average. That's how long into a fight it typically takes before a warrior has stable aggro. A knight has stable aggro from the moment the mob gets into spellcasting range. You can literally start slowing/nuking on incoming.

That's really all there is to the discussion.

In short, paladins are inferior, snap aggro isnt an issue in that trio if chanter competent, they need to med constantly, they get interrupted because they are weak af. They eat stuns all day, they have less hp and ac making cleric need to heal more, they do way less dps, and they smell.

That's really all there is to discuss