Rules clarification

[Ele]

Originally Posted by touchtonedialing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So finally you agree with me. TMO and Enraptured are the same guild. Even more so when the core of each guild are the same members.

So much incorrect in one post.

[Cecily]

I liked the part about TMO.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Danyelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think some of it was people saying they hate you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] lol

ah, I can live with that [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Treats]

Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we rolled in there thinking we was pro cuz we played on p99 and went up to our cool ledge to buff, guess what happened 3 seconds later?

Lol'd pretty hard this. Good stuff.

Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I went ahead and skipped over the fact you are using EZ, PEQ, and hidden forest as source material, but wow..

it's pretty clear you're dumb as shit.

Cannot believe 50 posts later someone actually points this out.

Using other EMU's as sources for a correct representation of a classic server?

Really................

[Frieza_Prexus]

As a point of information, the TMO = Enraptured debate is rather moot. TMO protested IB and VD raiding together because it impacted the rotation. The rotation that was a negotiated agreement between all the parties. In effect, what you heard was grumbling which was the result of a poorly negotiated deal on TMO's part.

We treated the two guilds as separate, and that miscalculation cost us. The fighting occurred when it came time to renegotiate the deal. IB & VD, clearly wanted the status quo, and TMO wanted to renegotiate. All of the back and forth was merely an expression of those sentiments.

There's nothing wrong with inter-guild raiding and alliances. Quite the opposite. The arguments (at least, as much as there was a cogent argument buried somewhere in all of that RnF mess) were that it was disingenuous of IB and VD to raid together yet be treated separately as part of the agreement. The IB/VD counter, of course, was that TMO had ratified that distinction in the first place.

[BruizeLee]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp-wWJBlck8

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by Treats [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol'd pretty hard this. Good stuff.



Cannot believe 50 posts later someone actually points this out.

Using other EMU's as sources for a correct representation of a classic server?

Really................

Yeah thats just Kental. Without fail everything Kental says is so grossly uneducated or biased we kind of just put it to the side without consideration now. It's sad because as far as i can tell Kental still has no idea. It must be a nice life being dumb as a fucking rock, being sentient brings a whole other level of problems.

[quido]

Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

tola spot is 100% in agro range, or at least it should be if working as intended. I don't need to ask my butt buddies they play on alkabor with me, we've killed trak a good 15 times, and guess what happen the first time.

we rolled in there thinking we was pro cuz we played on p99 and went up to our cool ledge to buff, guess what happened 3 seconds later?

Let's see some evidence that it was as you say in classic! Even then, the claim wouldn't be theirs until the change in aggro radius was effected on the server.

Gwence, you are dumb and should probably stop posting. Even if BDA were spawn socking and we decided to come park it right on top of them, there would be nothing against the rules with this. However if we tried to ninja the mob or the corpse or something, though, this would be breaking the rules. We sits where we wants, beeyotch.

"Ban TMO so we can kill stuff again" is what I'm hearing from Gwence and Relapsee and pals. You guys should write a song on this theme! I bet it would be really good.

[Gwence]

evidence?? like the server that's locked in 02 eq code that's never been modified kind of evidence?


and you're calling other people dumb..?

[quido]

So nothing changed between 2000 and 2002 as far as Kunark content? Ok then.

I don't really care one way or the other what Trakanon's aggro radius is. I'm just pointing out that "it's like this on AK" hasn't generally been sufficient evidence in itself to enact a development change here. You traditionally need some sort of evidence (from like the wayback machine) from the period. I'm sure such information is out there if Trak's aggro radius really was anything within sight.

I think it's funny and pathetic that you guys who don't even play here are calling for a ban over this incident. I'm sure that if we'd actually broken any rules that we'd be pretty sorry right now.