What's the story on Avatars and Signatures? - Page 23

Stonecrush · #**221** 03-10-2014, 04:18 PM

So we're bashing minorities at both ends?

The minority group that have the "Offensive" sigs, and the minority that care enough to complain about those same sigs?

Does the silent majority count in this war on sigs?

Regulations lead to less freedom. Give me freedom. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

loramin · #**222** 03-10-2014, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nekkojakk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

some people would rather change everyone else's sigs or have them moderated by staff.

I don't think anyone wanted to "change everyone's sigs". Rather, throughout this thread you can find pretty much universally agreement that we're talking about only a handful of people's sigs.

Shaakglith12194 · #**223** 03-10-2014, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xer0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not offended, I'm not just being blatantly ignorant about the fact that some people may be offended and or put off by it. Additionally I'm astounded at the hatred derived from such a simple question. You guys are acting like children.

If you're not offended, why are you making the argument? You are arguing for people that you don't even know exist. And Sony isn't going to shut down this project because some dudes on this forum have suggestive sigs. Nothing but weak arguments for more regulation all up in this thread. Freedom > restrictions so long as nobody is being hurt. When someone gets hurt as a result of this, boo-hoo, freedom still more important as long as it's not infringing on someone elses freedom.

drktmplr12 · #**224** 03-10-2014, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaakglith12194 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you're not offended, why are you making the argument? You are arguing for people that you don't even know exist. And Sony isn't going to shut down this project because some dudes on this forum have suggestive sigs. Nothing but weak arguments for more regulation all up in this thread. Freedom > restrictions so long as nobody is being hurt. When someone gets hurt as a result of this, boo-hoo, freedom still more important as long as it's not infringing on someone elses freedom.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

myriverse · #**225** 03-11-2014, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think anyone wanted to "change everyone's sigs". Rather, throughout this thread you can find pretty much universally agreement that we're talking about only a handful of people's sigs.

We're also talking about a handful of people who care what a person's avatar or sig is. The vast majority don't care but would prefer more freedom.

Champion_Standing · #**226** 03-11-2014, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean

Avatars and Signatures
All Avatars and signatures must not contain any explicit or NSFW content.

Swish · #**227** 03-11-2014, 09:55 AM

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

drktmplr12 · #**228** 03-11-2014, 10:26 AM

is that a woodchuck chucking wood? how much you think he will chuck?

Raavak · #**229** 03-11-2014, 10:29 AM

Who determines what is NFWS and isn't? I mean, staff ultimately, but there should be some self-policing so they don't have to be involved. Is my avatar NFWS?

khanable · #**230** 03-11-2014, 10:33 AM

hey guys what's going on in this thread