![]() |
|
#223
|
|||
|
TL;DR
Hasbinbad looks stupid, Reiker yells at people, Uallean argues in broken english. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#224
|
||||
|
Quote:
OH BOY! where do we start? better yet, in which eq emu server should we start this discussion? I know of at least a couple servers where the entire server populations would disagree with your statement. I hope for your sake you're one of the new ones, because if you're not there are quite a few skeletons in a certain closet that have been kept from you. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#225
|
|||
|
WI has been nothing but drama since they started. Nice try, tho.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#226
|
||||
|
Quote:
I had a lot of laughs on this thread but this one caught me by surprise. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Back on topic. If what the OP wrote actually happened, then it does indeed break the new raid rules. There is absolutely no reason why a GM should not be able to find out who damaged or aggroed Djorn first. It's no different than looking up transaction histories when looking for dupers. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#227
|
|||
|
I think the issue is where the Gms actually come into play.
In an instance such as this, it would be possible to see that the HT hit before the monk flying kicked or w/e, but if ultimately the burden of proof falls on the players and there isn't sufficient evidence to back their claim then the issue essentially goes down the toilet. On one side, I don't think the GMs should get involved with these things week in and week out. It draws them away from kunark and to be frank I don't think anyone here wants that. I'm sure they've got quite enough on their plate, and babysitting is the last thing on their minds. On the other hand, the rules are such that they invite controversy like this, in all honesty I'm surprised it took this long for something like this to have happened :P I don't think guilds want to have fraps running 24/7 just feel assured that poop-tornadoes such as this don't start brewing. I think all guilds should realize that cases like this will happen, but I also think there should be ways of settling this with minimal GM involvement. Somthing that would require a simple ctrl+f in a log to find the culprit. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#229
|
|||
|
24 pages, 22 of them dedicated to flaming uaellean, and now it looks like the next 20 of them will be devoted to flaming WI for that comment.....
how did DA and IB get ignored in this thread that was primarily only ABOUT them :/? i personally am still curious as to who ks'd who here! screenshot please [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#230
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|