Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, what you're basically saying is: you know you're wrong but don't want to admit it.

Because when you say "It is not my fault you seriously think class DPS can only be determined by gathering group data.", that's just a cowardly gesture to avoid the reality of your remarks.

You cowardly proclaim "unreliable variables with teammates" when faced with the fact that shaman is completely outclassed by mage in the group DPS role.

Even if what you say is true, then how does the parse of your solo DPS have any merit either?

In either case, you're just a cowardly scumbag too afraid to concede.

You are completely misconstruing what I am asking.

If I parse really well on my Shaman because I have a group of amazing players, and the Mage parses average because their group is just average, that alone will skew the data. It is not an accurate representation of the DPS difference. This would work AGAINST the Mage, so I don't think you would want that.

The reason why you parse solo is because it removes all external variables, so you can get the true average DPS between the classes. That is the first step in determining the average difference between the classes.

Once you have that, you can take it a step further by trying to prove how easy/hard it is to hit those numbers in a group. However, you would need to have the same group for both the Shaman and the Mage to rule out the possibility that differences are caused by the difficulty of the class, and not the group members.

This is how you run experiments. You don't just test everything at once without knowing what variables are affecting which outcome.

[Gloomlord]

Pretty obvious neither I, nor PlsNoBan, are trolls with the frustrated manner in which we're typing to you.

That would completely defeat the purpose of our "trolling", wouldn't it?

People like you, and a few others I've encountered, make me seriously consider leaving this game. It's full of thoroughly unintelligent people and/or drug addicts.

When nearly the whole forum is united against you, you *KNOW* you're crazy.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty obvious neither I, nor PlsNoBan, are trolls with the frustrated manner in which we're typing to you.

That would completely defeat the purpose of our "trolling", wouldn't it?

People like you, and a few others I've encountered, make me seriously consider leaving this game. It's full of thoroughly unintelligent people and/or drug addicts.

When nearly the whole forum is united against you, you *KNOW* you're crazy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum is not an argument, it is a fallacy.

Please address my previous post.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are completely misconstruing what I am asking.

If I parse really well on my Shaman because I have a group of amazing players, and the Mage parses average because their group is just average, that alone will skew the data. It is not an accurate representation of the DPS difference. This would work AGAINST the Mage, so I don't think you would want that.

The reason why you parse solo is because it removes all external variables, so you can get the true average DPS between the classes. That is the first step in determining the average difference between the classes.

Once you have that, you can take it a step further by trying to prove how easy/hard it is to hit those numbers in a group. However, you would need to have the same group for both the Shaman and the Mage to rule out the possibility that differences are caused by the difficulty of the class, and not the group members.

This is how you run experiments. You don't just test everything at once without knowing what variables are affecting which outcome.

You are a coward.

Parsing solo is irrelevant to group activities, you idiot. We've explained this to you several times.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are a coward.

Parsing solo is irrelevant to group activities, you idiot. We've explained this to you several times.

Insults are not an argument.

Please address this post https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331 .

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please address my previous post.

Pleaded the (700+ post) poster who has ignored or misconstrued his understanding (intentionally or otherwise) of many irrefutable facts, and has not answered the majority of the questions I have posed to him hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

Notice the other things attached to "idiot" and "coward"?

Cowardly idiot.

Clutch tightly to "argumentum ad populum", you arrogant fuckwit.

[cyxthryth]

Oops, double post hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Notice the other things attached to "idiot" and "coward"?

Cowardly idiot.

Clutch tightly to "argumentum ad populum", you arrogant fuckwit.

Insults are not an argument.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331 please address this. It should be trivial if you think you have done it already.

[Gloomlord]

Your insanity isn't an argument, either.

We're all supposed to "play nice", but DSM makes that impossible. Idiotic, dishonest filth like him should be playing WoW retail. I'm sure he'd fit in quite nicely...

And for the last time: I already addressed. At least 5 other people did also.