religion

[rgostic]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What created the Matter and Energy of The Big Bang

Something cannot come from Nothing

Matter cannot be created or destroyed right?

We have no idea. This is the mystery of the universe.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

obvious

There's that word again. You've used it several times in this thread.

What's obvious is that you disregard all forms of tangible evidence. What's obvious is that you concentrate on what is not (yet) testable in a lab instead of what is.

[rgostic]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Evolution is a hoax

There are little motors that make up atoms and molecules. These little motors have up to 30 individual moving parts. In order for these little motors to function, all moving parts must exist and work in complete symbiosis at the exact same time. Evolution would have been an impossibility. These are building blocks that make up all Matter.

You have no idea what you are talking about; this is a godawful metaphor. The theory of evolution doesn't apply to individual atoms. They don't have DNA. Also, molecules don't have motors.

[Pokesan]

i didn't read the thread but I'm going to boldly theorize that it's 99% luddites or just plain dumb folks arguing with each other

*flies away*

[rgostic]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That bacteria becomes something new or is it still just bacteria?

Your brain hasn't learned how to understand time scales beyond that which it experiences. Demanding to observe macro-evolution during your at most 100 year life span is like a fruit fly not believing in annual cycles because its life span exists within a single season.

[rgostic]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nonsense

If your claim is true there would be a fossil record that proved this. The fossil record (evidence) shows the exact opposite. There are no transmutational fossils that show any change of kinds? Why?

You want people to believe these phantom changes that allegedly happen over billions of years based upon faith. That isn't science.

The fossil record is absolutely imperfect due to erosional forces combined with the difficulty in preserving body fossils, yet it is still chock full of species which are intermediates between previous and later species. Do better research.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by rgostic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your brain hasn't learned how to understand time scales beyond that which it experiences. Demanding to observe macro-evolution during your at most 100 year life span is like a fruit fly not believing in annual cycles because its life span exists within a single season.

So really he just needs more faith.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i didn't read the thread but I'm going to boldly theorize that it's 99% luddites or just plain dumb folks arguing with each other

*flies away*

You are by far the smartest person to post in this thread yet.

[rgostic]

To understand evolution its branching nature must be comprehended. When speciation occurs, it does not replace the species from which it evolved.

[iruinedyourday]

how bout that santa clause zing eh glenzig? gotcha with that one. still feeln pretty good about it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]