Mage epic

[cd288]

There's also the alternative of actually providing tangible evidence to support your own claims instead of just sharing your own opinion and then demanding evidence from anyone who disagrees with you lol

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But, as I noted above when I responded to CD, I think the core argument remains unchanged. A few people knew about safe spots ... but they were still the vast, vast minority of the server

The fact that someone complained about it to Aradune and that Aradune was aware of it fully indicates that it was a prevalent issue in the game that people knew safe spots and could easily sit there. But keep trying to demean it when someone proves you wrong lol.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But keep trying to demean it when someone proves you wrong lol.

I thanked him and posted a Minions animated gif ... and you took that as me demeaning him?

You are really, really bad at comprehending the words I post.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I thanked him and posted a Minions animated gif ... and you took that as me demeaning him?

You are really, really bad at comprehending the words I post.

Ironic that you talk about reading comprehension considering I never said demean him. I said demean IT (i.e., the evidence). You should really think before you post.

[loramin]

But I didn't demean his evidence either: I literally said it was "awesome"!

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Finally, someone actually responding to my points: thank you! Awesome quote: I learned something, and you have successfully weakened my argument.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just don't get how you can read any "demeanment" ...

[Toxigen]

you two rdy to hug it out?

[cd288]

Awesome but doesn't prove anything...thanks for sharing bro! I'm still right!

[loramin]

I'll try to simplify things further.

My core argument (modulo a few zeroes) is just "1% of 1% of 1% is a small number". Even if someone changes a single "1%" to a "2%", the result is still .... a really small number.

[Trexller]

i feel like that number is too low

they knew approximately when mobs would respawn, so I have to assume that some ranger up in hate was like, "hey guys why don't i camp here so I can check what has spawned"

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i feel like that number is too low

they knew approximately when mobs would respawn, so I have to assume that some ranger up in hate was like, "hey guys why don't i camp here so I can check what has spawned"

It does, if you think like a P99er. We've forgotten what classic was like here.

That hypothetical ranger can't even count on a 96% rez when he inevitably dies. If 51+ clerics even exist yet, his guild might not have one, let alone have one coming on the next Hate raid.

And who says his guild will even raid Hate before his corpse poofs? Even if they have a weekly raid, he'd have to get up there and get rezzed like the moment it starts (presumably he's doing this after last week's raid) , or else he loses every item on that character.

Remember, live GMs didn't summon rotted corpses to EC (or if they did, 99.9% of the server didn't know). People truly feared losing a corpse somewhere scary ... and Hate was about as scary as it got.