|
Quote:
I'd say "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman" seems pretty broad, and is certainly justification to perform one for a 10-year old. But I'll read the full language as well. EDIT: ffs stupid govt website down again (for me at least)
__________________
| |||
|
|
Better off just reading the Ohio codes since the bill is from 2019.
Understanding law is like starkind, they make it hard for no reason. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
f1=Q#
| ||
|
|
Indiana AG has already announced an investigation into the abortion doc, it's going to be a long drive to Canada once you Trumptards manage to install the fat pedophile as president for life and legislate a federal ban.
| ||
|
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
Swalwell: It would not be an abortion if a 10 year old with her parents made the decision not to have a baby that was the result of rape?
Republican Witness: That’s not an abortion. lmao what is it then if not an abortion? You fundamentalists are some nutty motherfuckers. | ||
|
|
The idea that this country would be able to coexist with each other with a complete abortion ban is nuts.
I dont diasgree there are religious fantatics that want that. But there is just no way that that would happen short of a civil war and the winner forcing that. I just dont see the country functioning with that law. The system would shut down. I wouldnt also be surprised if the plan was to agitate people into a civil war, so they can force it though. But it takes two to tango, so the only way to win is to wait till november and see the blue wave. | ||
|
|
Quote:
You quoting Chicom compromised Swalwell is rich. See: Fang Fang
__________________
| |||
|
|
Quote:
Why are you so desperate to change the subject of Schrodinger's abortion? | |||
|
|
|