Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities?
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city 41 18.55%
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city 35 15.84%
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city 33 14.93%
Bush burned the crime infested towers 153 69.23%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #24461  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:50 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Trump 2020

27 more years!

USHER IN THE EMPIRE OF MAN
i thought you wanted our military out of the desert man?
  #24462  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:53 PM
ScaringChildren ScaringChildren is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i thought you wanted our military out of the desert man?
https://youtu.be/u1w4IxCXIxU
  #24463  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:55 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
awesome
  #24464  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:57 PM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

The reality is, its not an issue of racism.

It doesnt matter how many refugees europe takes in to stabilize the issues caused by overpopulation in the middle east and africa this year, because next year, they will need to take in the same amount plus 5% more, because the asorption rate does not exceed their breeding rate.

The first world is not reproducing at a rate that exceeds reaplcement rates. The third world is.

There are only 2 choices in the long term. Massive warfare (which merely delays the issue from becoming acute again), or forcing birth control on the third world. Some advancement may be possible by increasing agricultural yield technology but that will require substantial investment in the third world, and even then birth control is still required. We're in an era where "war" is not as acceptable as it once was for controlling population size so the latter must be explored if we intend to remedy the cause, instead of whack a moling symptoms which still lead to the same inevitable end.

Its unfortunate, but we're looking at the endgame of malthusian economics at work here.

Tough shit if that doesnt jive with your left/right worldview. Letting them erase us from history doesnt fix the problem, it only stalls the inevitable, because even with all the first worlders (of any race) decimated, that only buys 10 years before the global population is at terminal velocity again, and then you dont have the people with the knowledge on how to maximize agricultural yield left.

The population growth rate of africa is 2.5%, and is the largest culprit in pushing the migration agenda.

The natural logarithm of 2 is 0.63

0.63/0.025 means that at the current rate of growth, africa will double its population in just over 25 years. Africas migration into europe is largely fueled by their population ALREADY being at carrying capacity or very near it.

Africa currently contains approximately 1.3billion people. This means that their "migration crisis" necessitates the rest of the world absorbing 1.2billion people over the next 25 years to remain at the current level it contains.

This is nearly the total number of people in north america and europe combined.

If you also consider the population growth rate of asia's 4.5+bilion people growing at a rate of 1.1%, were looking at a "refugee crisis"out of asia to the tune of 4.5billion people over the next 55 or so years with their "doubling rate determine by taking the natural logarithm of 2 divided by the population growth rate (63/.011)
Last edited by Throndor; 01-09-2019 at 12:01 AM..
  #24465  
Old 01-09-2019, 12:00 AM
misterbonkers misterbonkers is offline
Fire Giant

misterbonkers's Avatar

Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So who watched the wall speech? I didn't.
tuned in for all of 5 seconds only to close it immediately and find myself disinterested, and would rather wait for the inevitable politico fact check
__________________
  #24466  
Old 01-09-2019, 12:03 AM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

https://youtu.be/XArx0ASwyDc
  #24467  
Old 01-09-2019, 12:51 AM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The reality is, its not an issue of racism.

It doesnt matter how many refugees europe takes in to stabilize the issues caused by overpopulation in the middle east and africa this year, because next year, they will need to take in the same amount plus 5% more, because the asorption rate does not exceed their breeding rate.

The first world is not reproducing at a rate that exceeds reaplcement rates. The third world is.

There are only 2 choices in the long term. Massive warfare (which merely delays the issue from becoming acute again), or forcing birth control on the third world. Some advancement may be possible by increasing agricultural yield technology but that will require substantial investment in the third world, and even then birth control is still required. We're in an era where "war" is not as acceptable as it once was for controlling population size so the latter must be explored if we intend to remedy the cause, instead of whack a moling symptoms which still lead to the same inevitable end.

Its unfortunate, but we're looking at the endgame of malthusian economics at work here.

Tough shit if that doesnt jive with your left/right worldview. Letting them erase us from history doesnt fix the problem, it only stalls the inevitable, because even with all the first worlders (of any race) decimated, that only buys 10 years before the global population is at terminal velocity again, and then you dont have the people with the knowledge on how to maximize agricultural yield left.

The population growth rate of africa is 2.5%, and is the largest culprit in pushing the migration agenda.

The natural logarithm of 2 is 0.63

0.63/0.025 means that at the current rate of growth, africa will double its population in just over 25 years. Africas migration into europe is largely fueled by their population ALREADY being at carrying capacity or very near it.

Africa currently contains approximately 1.3billion people. This means that their "migration crisis" necessitates the rest of the world absorbing 1.2billion people over the next 25 years to remain at the current level it contains.

This is nearly the total number of people in north america and europe combined.

If you also consider the population growth rate of asia's 4.5+bilion people growing at a rate of 1.1%, were looking at a "refugee crisis"out of asia to the tune of 4.5billion people over the next 55 or so years with their "doubling rate determine by taking the natural logarithm of 2 divided by the population growth rate (63/.011)
Population control is a small, negligeble effect of war which is primarily driven by economic forces. Loquacity isn't an indication of perceptiveness.
__________________
  #24468  
Old 01-09-2019, 12:58 AM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
tuned in for all of 5 seconds only to close it immediately and find myself disinterested, and would rather wait for the inevitable politico fact check
About what I expected, danke.
__________________
  #24469  
Old 01-09-2019, 01:04 AM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Population control is a small, negligeble effect of war which is primarily driven by economic forces. Loquacity isn't an indication of perceptiveness.
Commenting on the wordiness of the explanation doesnt change the math.

Are you denying the science of malthusian economics? Thats rich.

If the argument is that migration is happening because of overpopulation (which the african migrants are claiming is the prime cause) then absorbing them without addressing the birth rate is absorbing the symptom; not addressing the CAUSE.

http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/.../expogrow.html
Last edited by Throndor; 01-09-2019 at 01:08 AM..
  #24470  
Old 01-09-2019, 01:17 AM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Commenting on the wordiness of the explanation doesnt change the math.

Are you denying the science of malthusian economics? Thats rich.

If the argument is that migration is happening because of overpopulation (which the african migrants are claiming is the prime cause) then absorbing them without addressing the birth rate is absorbing the symptom; not addressing the CAUSE.

http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/.../expogrow.html
There's more, obvious, holes in my succint postings. There's more, obvious, observations you're omitting. You're assuming a lot too.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.