Enchanter OP impact poll

[magnetaress]

BTW I clarified that down from Enchanter in general to people using charm.

Charm is manipulative but doesn't automatically make you a Nazi or womanizer.

If your thing is charming skeletons or swarthy male orcs. That's creepy, borderline necrophilia err necromancy, or the slippery slope. And masochistic.

Still mayyybe not a Nazi, idk. Rly.

[magnetaress]

Also why would you scare people, animals, or dragons then send a monster, like a snake to kill them?

[Jibartik]

Lots of creepy ppl seem rly pro Enchanter unclassic OPness. Guess they are into nonconcentual charming/domming. Manipulation. Controll. Brainwashing.

naw I just want to control the properties of the universe.

aka have a game genie for irl

aka be an enchanter in eq!

haha but i get your point, actually ssessdidrrixxssss on his necro wiki has a like a lore section on his wiki where he goes on about how necros are about growth and raising immaterial matter back to life, and therefore are not even as close to evil as the mind raping enchanters who drive people to kill their friends.

[magnetaress]

I guess if it's for the greater good and the protection of Tunare...

Jk hope u know I'm just trolling it's just a game. One I obviously take to seriously.

[magnetaress]

Memblur is the best spell.

And atone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Memblur is the best spell.

And atone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Atone amazing for 1) name and 2) the name of clicky.

[DMN]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Baler]

Imagine trying to charm on shitty internet from 1999-2001.
Or random crashes or downtimes.

We need to emulate internet from 1999! It's the only solution.

[qezelia]

Imagine reading that fighting outdoors is dangerous and then continuing further as if there's any credibility left in what is being said.

[DMN]

He mostly played/wrote during the early Classic period. you can see in one of his notes where he mentions that DoTs no longer count as neutral damage sources. Which means he must have been playing pretty early after the game was released as that was changed really early on.

He also goes out of his way to mention velious/luclin "updates" yet never does for kunark, which again makes me think he primarily wrote that from vanilla through kunark, hence never mentions kunark.

The problem with charm and how much cha affects it is, is that the randomness of the spell is so great that whatever cha is possibly doing i's very hard to tell and to properly tested youd need a massive sample size due to that varience. A week or two ago on green at level 60, I was charming a level 36-36 mob with no special reists to magic and it broke 6 times in row within the first 2-3 ticks. other times I get back to back max duration charms. With variance like that it would take thousands upon thousands of hours of charm testing with the same mob to come to any decent conclusion.