the i dont care about politics anymore thread

[magnetaress]

Waiting on the Antichrist to make his move. The antichrist needs to be fully revealed first. It's not Darkbrandon or Idiot Lady.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I still don't understand mate.

Do you?

Mandatory spending is generally governed by statutory criteria; it is not normally set by annual appropriation acts.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also the US is the bully here. It's been the bully for some odd 80 years now and It's not a good look. With current events we don't have a leg left of self righteousness and superiority to stand on either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion

[Jibartik]

Imagine living in a world where there was an American political party that was saying things like this unprecedented military buildup around the globe is threatening all of our lives and we must all unite as a species to stop this outrageous saber rattling that is killing millions of people around the world and going to cost mass starvation and energy crisis and affect everyone on earth and could destroy the planet with climate change we must unite and stop the fight.

But instead we have two military parties that are like we need to do preemptive strikes because we have intelligence that say that there’s threats against our nations security.

Anyone who says that we should stop fighting is attacked by both sides for being a pro terrorist Hitler lover.

This rhetoric is like straight up cultish.

[magnetaress]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Imagine living in a world where there was an American political party that was saying things like this unprecedented military buildup around the globe is threatening all of our lives and we must all unite as a species to stop this outrageous saber rattling that is killing millions of people around the world and going to cost mass starvation and energy crisis and affect everyone on earth and could destroy the planet with climate change we must unite and stop the fight.

But instead we have two military parties that are like we need to do preemptive strikes because we have intelligence that say that there’s threats against our nations security.

Anyone who says that we should stop fighting is attacked by both sides for being a pro terrorist Hitler lover.

This rhetoric is like straight up cultish.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Imagine living in a world where there was an American political party that was saying things like this unprecedented military buildup around the globe is threatening all of our lives and we must all unite as a species to stop this outrageous saber rattling that is killing millions of people around the world and going to cost mass starvation and energy crisis and affect everyone on earth and could destroy the planet with climate change we must unite and stop the fight.

But instead we have two military parties that are like we need to do preemptive strikes because we have intelligence that say that there’s threats against our nations security.

Anyone who says that we should stop fighting is attacked by both sides for being a pro terrorist Hitler lover.

This rhetoric is like straight up cultish.

Intervention saved China from Soviet nuclear attack

[Jibartik]

If the old men who drew lines on maps said we had to mutually destroy the planet because we refuse to let lines on the map get redrawn.

Is that really productive?

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Intervention saved China from Soviet nuclear attack

Is that when the antichrist (nixon) started globalism that would result in the planet collapsing under the weight of mass consumerism?

*checks notes

Yep!

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I still don't understand mate.

Do you?

Bro did you READ the link you sourced?

The authority for discretionary spending stems from annual appropriation acts, which are under the control of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. Most defense, education, and transportation programs, for example, are funded that way, as are a variety of other federal programs and activities. Those appropriations are subject to a set of budget enforcement rules and processes that differ from those that apply to mandatory spending. As the Congress considers appropriation acts, CBO tallies the budget authority those acts would provide and estimates the outlays that would result.

Outlays for the nation’s three largest entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid) and for many smaller programs (unemployment compensation, retirement programs for federal employees, student loans, and deposit insurance, for example) are mandatory spending.

Which is exactly what I've been saying for pages now. Why inject a budget gimmick into this bill that is supposed to be specifically focused on "Burn Pits" and basically create an entirely new welfare/entitlement program with no oversight, no cap with massive spending cooked into the Federal Budget literally on autopilot without any yearly review or budget enforcement.

The CBO even says (and I've pasted it right from their report multiple times) that NORMALLY costs within this bill would be classified as discretionary, but they changed the language on purpose as a gimmick. It's literally a couple sentences in the bill that could have been fixed in a matter of minutes, but Schumer demanded a vote without any amendments because Dems are playing mid term games with Vets HC which is shameless and cynical politicking in an election year

Even the guy that wrote the book on burn pits and our military is calling them out on these shenanigans

You're just rabbit holing with your usual ambiguity and emojis

Embarrassing

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bro did you READ the link you sourced?





Which is exactly what I've been saying for pages now. Why inject a budget gimmick into this bill that is supposed to be specifically focused on "Burn Pits" and basically create an entirely new welfare/entitlement program with no oversight, no cap with massive spending cooked into the Federal Budget literally on autopilot without any yearly review or budget enforcement.

The CBO even says (and I've pasted it right from their report multiple times) that NORMALLY costs within this bill would be classified as discretionary, but they changed the language on purpose as a gimmick. It's literally a couple sentences in the bill that could have been fixed in a matter of minutes, but Schumer demanded a vote without any amendments because Dems are playing mid term games with Vets HC which is shameless and cynical politicking in an election year

Even the guy that wrote the book on burn pits and our military is calling them out on these shenanigans

You're just rabbit holing with your usual ambiguity and emojis

Embarrassing

Hope it helped.