Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 12-22-2013, 01:45 AM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That being said, do you guys even have a guild leader elected?
A number of options are being discussed amongst various parties. I imagine news will develop over the next several days.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
  #252  
Old 12-22-2013, 02:02 AM
talian21 talian21 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantasm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't see how this is a discussion at all - this has become a few people arguing over NOTHING. Almost all of the guilds currently adhering to the player conspired Sky schedule are honoring and accepting FE's desire to move to a better time slot. A guild can not contest that if they are NO longer a guild, that shouldn't have to be stated.

As to the Bob's noncommittal approach to the scheduling of Sky that is exactly the attitude the GM's did NOT want to see. They expect us to settle this among ourselves and not try to be separate elitists all holding measuring sticks. Pointing the blame at one person or even one guild is not correct - this withering of humility has been happening for a long time and has been happening from EVERY guild. This cut-throat mentality just has no room in the ENJOYABLE raid scenario.

Now I know there will inevitably be a few top guilds, and that's to be expected, but this constant bickering is NOT the way to go about settling things. Use your brain, I know most of you have them. If an underdog wants a shot, whose to stop them from trying? The same guilds vying for dominance. This is supposed to be a player coordinated attempt at civility, lets give it a shot ?
This is one classy post. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #253  
Old 12-22-2013, 03:09 AM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

This is the problem with rotations. They are not gm enforced.
They only work when they are mutually beneficial. So actually divinity FE whoever has no authority to make any schedule that effects anyone that hasn't agreed to the schedule. If TMO or any other guild is not a part of your little treaty, we can raid whenever the hell we want, and it reverts back to FTe or whatever criteria Sirken and the staff lay down. Like fear and hate. Etc.

So it's a bold move to put some salt in our wound umbrella. But honestly, the best thing to do at this point is not take advantage of the situation but realize that TMO members Will reform and we will be a player in the raid scene for year so come.

Anyways. Always liked you you. Consider you a good friend. Appreciate the job your doing leading Fe, but this whole scheme is bs IMO.

Dolic
  #254  
Old 12-22-2013, 03:55 AM
Elements Elements is offline
Fire Giant

Elements's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 501
Default

FE claims a new era of play-nice-policy for the raid scene. First official act since claim is to usurp another guilds sky day from a long established player agreed to sky rotation (title of post ***TAKE***) on some bullshit made-up technicality... TMO is not banned from sky. I'm glad the veil on your phoney PR attempt has been lifted so quickly.
  #255  
Old 12-22-2013, 03:59 AM
Thulack Thulack is offline
Planar Protector

Thulack's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: In my living room.
Posts: 4,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elements [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE claims a new era of play-nice-policy for the raid scene. First official act since claim is to usurp another guilds sky day from a long established player agreed to sky rotation (title of post ***TAKE***) on some bullshit made-up technicality... TMO is not banned from sky. I'm glad the veil on your phoney PR attempt has been lifted so quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Mystical Order

Recently the guild formerly known as The Mystical Order disbanded.
What guild is this?
__________________
  #256  
Old 12-22-2013, 04:07 AM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elements [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE claims a new era of play-nice-policy for the raid scene. First official act since claim is to usurp another guilds sky day from a long established player agreed to sky rotation (title of post ***TAKE***) on some bullshit made-up technicality... TMO is not banned from sky. I'm glad the veil on your phoney PR attempt has been lifted so quickly.
You're not really interested in understanding, your interest is in flaming. If you've read through the pages in this thread, you'll see the overwhelming support for FE to take the day which a no longer existent guild used to occupy. Usurpation is an ugly word. Rumor on the street is Zagum is looking to reunite some of the members of the former TMO. I'm willing to work with him to come to a resolution of some capacity. Beyond that, see you on Sunday.
  #257  
Old 12-22-2013, 07:24 AM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
<Lord Bob> has expressed their intention of shitting all over the sky rotation for some time. They tried to fuck Divinity on Wednesday as well.

That being said, Lazie has a point as well. It doesn't really make sense for them to make enemies of FE. I was discussing this with Bringback and we were fairly sure they would go for AG, Divinity, and The A-Team simply because we are are the smallest. It would not surprise me at all if the core of <Lord Bob> are some TMO alts/ex TMO who are pissed of and, to quote The Dark Knight, "just want to see the world burn".

IMO both <Lord Bob> and any TMO that went up with them need to start taking a little heat for this.

I definitely agree that TMO should be in any peace process. I know a lot of people want to burn the ex TMO at stake, but hey, if you wanna say you play nice you have to play nice when it hurts, ya know? That being said, do you guys even have a guild leader elected?
  #258  
Old 12-22-2013, 08:39 AM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

if I see TMO up there with zag as leader I wont step on his toes in good faith and let the new TMO have their day as usual but will continue to think its underserving due to sat mornings actions of some of their members, I think other FE would back me up on this and we'll figure it out when its not such a sensitive subject, pending their leadership change.
  #259  
Old 12-22-2013, 08:41 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

If any of your leaders are around, please have them get in touch with me regarding sky today.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #260  
Old 12-22-2013, 08:44 AM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

lets talk now cause I have some new info about it, brella gave me fulls reigns
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.