Munich Mall Shooting -

[fash]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was making fun of Fash's claim that the cultural changes we've seen were some top-down agenda perpetrated by elite liberals, which is retarded. FDR & LBJ were the product of the spirit of their times, not the other way around.

Clearly was Emperor Zog's plan.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cat ladies are less happy than mothers later in life. It is know.

Its known. He hasn't a leg to stand on.

The predicament is that the men are becoming less available as a result of the change. You can talk to any career woman about this side of the coin.

See big J's post above. The dick-slang lifestyle is where its at until the age of 50 or so and by then men are exiting the child-bearing market place. This manufactured unhappiness is a direct result of the ideology (((Lune))) espouses.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're making lots of idiotic assumptions

Assumptions will be made.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're making lots of idiotic assumptions about what I believe about women. If it makes you feel any better, I agree the direction we've gone hasn't been all sunshine and rainbows for women and for society in general.

I was making fun of Fash's claim that the cultural changes we've seen were some top-down agenda perpetrated by elite liberals, which is retarded. FDR & LBJ and their policies were the product of the spirit of their times, not the other way around.

Stuart Chase was an FDR economist who wrote a book called "The New Deal". He was a Fabian socialist so it was definitely more top down than you are letting on.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're making lots of idiotic assumptions about what I believe about women. If it makes you feel any better, I agree the direction we've gone hasn't been all sunshine and rainbows for women and for society in general.

I was making fun of Fash's claim that the cultural changes we've seen were some top-down agenda perpetrated by elite liberals, which is retarded. FDR & LBJ and their policies were the product of the spirit of their times, not the other way around.

This, particularly the last sentence, is intersting. Your previous posts seem to suggest that you hold FDR and LBJ in high regard, but here you seem to suggest that you disagree their policies. which is it? Mixed?

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its known. He hasn't a leg to stand on.

The predicament is that the men are becoming less available as a result of the change. You can talk to any career woman about this side of the coin.

See big J's post above. The dick-slang lifestyle is where its at until the age of 50 or so and by then men are exiting the child-bearing market place. This manufactured unhappiness is a direct result of the ideology (((Lune))) espouses.

The perspective of someone who has never met actual successful women in their personal life, and gets their perceptions from the internet, likely from /pol/ or /r/theredpill

[Lune]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This, particularly the last sentence, is intersting. Your previous posts seem to suggest that you hold FDR and LBJ in high regard, but here you seem to suggest that you disagree their policies. which is it? Mixed?

Wouldn't the world be a shitty place if we could only judge things in a binary fashion? Yes, no. Good, bad. It sure would be a lot simpler, and that's why black and white thinking is one of the hallmarks of a weak mind.

I do hold FDR and LBJ in high regard. I also disagree with some of their policies.

[fash]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

FDR & LBJ and their policies were the product of the spirit of their times, not the other way around.

The National Organization of Women promoting the spirit of their times:

“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”

Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?

“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do hold FDR and LBJ in high regard. I also disagree with some of their policies.

That is what I am asking ^^ Was hoping you'd expand, because I've never seen you express any form of dislike for them or their policies. Curious which you like and which you have issue with.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do hold FDR and LBJ in high regard. I also disagree with some of their policies.

My main policy disagreement with LBJ would probably have to be his assassination policy on JFK. I didn't agree with that policy :/