PvP Range - Page 27

vinx · #1 11-09-2011, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rallyd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

An arguement can be made that 4+/- level range is classic, I believe sullon was the only exception to this and was created much later on anyways.

Vallon was +/- 8 for as long as i can remember

Nirgon · #2 11-09-2011, 08:09 PM

Mostly want to grief more.

vinx · #3 11-09-2011, 10:04 PM

im going to go ahead and post my suggestion of: +/- 2

cuz when im 25 and still using level 24 spells,
i dont want to be jacked by someone using level 29 spells

so a +/- 2 would make for freakin awesome competitive pvp at ANY level!
trust me

Nirgon · #4 11-10-2011, 01:05 PM

I can think of some EQ vets here that think +4/-4 and FFA IN RAID ZONES is fine.

xblade724 · #5 11-27-2011, 08:54 AM

1) Should be +4/-4 for free-for-all pvp (like rallos). TZ/VZ was *ONLY* +8/-8 because it was team based.
2) If in level range, should con white. If out of range, should con either green or red. This way you have some risk instead of seeking out just blues that don't stand a chance

View Poll Results: Are you happy with an 8 level pvp range
Yes	75	41.44%
No (Post your suggested level difference)	106	58.56%
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll