Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Basically what this guy says is it's ok for scientists to make claims towards what is accurately correct and not correct without extensive proof, but not religious people.
|
I know it's not going to do a whole lot of good, but I wanted to address this.
No. That is not what he said. Science is a process. It has no ego and no sacred cows. Evolution may perhaps one day be proven false, and if it is, science will immediately adopt that new evidence into its framework. There is no dogma beyond methodological rigor, and no belief beyond knowing that you do not know everything.
When you flip a light switch you expect the lights to come on. You have done this thousands of times, and every time the bulb comes on. Repeat action has established a trend of consistency that leads to a reasonable expectation that flipping the switch will turn the light on or off. The first time the bulb burned out you were probably puzzled, but no matter, you simply adopted this new fact into your world view and moved on. Eventually you figured out that in 99.9% of switch flips the light comes on and in the rest it's broken.
The "theory" of evolution has been built in exactly the same way. It is no more than a reasonable explanation for observations made in the course of study. Consistency and predictive power is the essence of good theory, and the theory of evolution has promise in both areas. It is an incomplete model, but it is one that has successfully explained observations without itself being invalidated. This is the core of the scientific method; it is process without ego. Should we gather enough contrary evidence to exhaust the possibilities of evolution, it will be abandoned without hesitation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Leewong
Face it, you are a sinner and are not welcome in God's kingdom.
|
Perhaps you are frustrated, but this does nothing to make your argument more appealing. Science has no feelings, but people do, and you're being a rather poor diplomat right now. Also, Aquinas solved this problem a long time ago. Drop the act. Did you come here to spread ideas or to troll?