Hey Forsaken

[dafier]

Originally Posted by Faron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

alarti is the king of turning a debate into a debate about debating. He's one of these stupid fucks that took a political science class and thinks he's now the master of logic.

You have to have logic to master it. He possesses neither.

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This might be something you won't understand Troubled, but my motivation in a discussion is not the viewership count or if I'm being entertaining.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Samoht]

It looks like my work here is done.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It looks like my work here is done.

If you intention was to make a fool of yourself while you backpedaled from every argument you made then yes.. you did a damn good job. Run away now kiddo.

[Troubled]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you intention was to make a fool of yourself while you backpedaled from every argument you made then yes.. you did a damn good job. Run away now kiddo.

I'm not sure what backpedaling is or how the term is applied to the ridicule you're receiving. Can you please copy/pasta a definition for me from Google or Wikipedia? Maybe that will help with my reading comprehension.

Thanks in advance.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not sure what backpedaling is or how the term is applied to the ridicule you're receiving. Can you please copy/pasta a definition for me from Google or Wikipedia? Maybe that will help with my reading comprehension.

Thanks in advance.

Oh... you think ridicule from BDA makes your argument correct? Another logical fallacy.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh... you think ridicule from BDA makes your argument correct? Another logical fallacy.

Prove it.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.

Oh come on you know how much I like proving it.

argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."

Argumentum ad hominem – the evasion of the actual topic by directing an attack at your opponent.

Ad hominem – attacking the arguer instead of the argument.
Poisoning the well – a type of ad hominem where adverse information about a target is presented with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says.[61]
Abusive fallacy – a subtype of "ad hominem" when it turns into verbal abuse of the opponent rather than arguing about the originally proposed argument.[62]


Proved it so hard.

[Kushie]

Alarti still sharts out his fingers.