Arizona election audit finds massive fraud and irregularities

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know when you have evidence of where those ~74k mail ins that were counted came from? Let's stay on track, I know you have lots of questions. I'll check again tomorrow.

(Trump won, it was a blow out)

Page 21 of the thread…. “The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail.”

Don’t mean to make your head spin but there is another issue….

Folks who worry about dark money in politics like myself have been waiting with bated breath for the Supreme Court to decide Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta. The organization’s lawyers argued that California can’t find out the donors to secretive nonprofits like the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which was founded by the Koch Brothers.

The the supreme Court ruled against the state and discounted its given reason for demanding donors’ names, which had to do with preventing fraud in charitable fundraising.
In American elections over the past decade, there has been a growing problem with dark money, which is spending in elections that cannot be traced to its original donor. Dark money becomes untraceable when it is syphoned through an opaque nonprofit like a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization or 501(c)(6) trade organization. Open Secrets estimated that there was nearly $1 billion in dark money in federal elections between 2010 and 2020, plus an additional $1 billion in undisclosed money spent in the 2020 election alone.
Some nonprofits have very complex structures, with a 501(c)(3) charitable arm, a 501(c)(4) social-welfare arm, and even a 527 purely political arm. Americans for Prosperity is a 501(c)(3) charity. So technically it is not allowed under IRS rules to intervene in any partisan election without risking its tax exempt status.
Meanwhile, California had a rule that all charities soliciting funds in the state need to confidentially report their donors to the attorney general’s office so that the state can root out potential charity fraud. California required this disclosure from Americans for Prosperity, which sued stating that the law violated its First Amendment rights.
the reality is that dark money already relies on opaque nonprofits to hide the identity of its true sources. Americans for Prosperity makes it easier for the ultra-wealthy to hide their role in bankrolling politically active charities.

Foreign entities as well?

yes, foreign entities. https://ballotpedia.org/501(c)(4) That would of course qualify as emoluments if proven and the NRA has gone down in part for that.

the real election fraud was in front of us the whole time...

I know.. I know… George Soros meme when blaming the Koch Brothers.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So no one has any evidence of where those 74k mail ins came from or who filled them out?

OK, I'll check back

Remember, its what you can prove

Edit: https://t.me/praying_medic/3203

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Manbun guy threatening violent reprisals against his political opponents is very TYOOL 2021.

[Nirgon]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the cucks rigged the election, biggest political crime in US history exposed

[Thorgrimm]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Page 21 of the thread…. “The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail.”

There is literally no chain of custody for these ballots. Maricopa County election officials won't provide the data necessary to verify them and are defying a court order to do so. As of right now, the ballots appeared out of thin air. Could be a benign reason, but chain of custody must be proven for them to be legal. Otherwise they need to be thrown out.

It gets worse:

There are supposedly 11 thousand votes from voters not on the voter rolls on election day. They magically appeared on the voter rolls a month later, but apparently voted a month earlier?

There are 25 thousand ballots that do not have a serial number

A large number of ballots are printed on the wrong type of paper

So the actual number is closer to 115-125 thousand potentially bogus votes that should be tossed out. Not 75.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the cucks rigged the election, biggest political crime in US history exposed

[Nirgon]

Alex Jones isnt doing the forensic audit lol

Its been proven now, it was a blow out in Donny's favor

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Horza]

You guys must realize even if Cyber Ninjas somehow travel back in time and prevent the election results from being certified in Arizona, then Biden would still have won handily.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are supposedly 11 thousand votes from voters not on the voter rolls on election day. They magically appeared on the voter rolls a month later, but apparently voted a month earlier?

Claims continued that there were 11,326 people who didn’t show up on the voter rolls on Nov. 7 who later appeared on the final voter rolls on Dec. 4. It was expressed a logical explanation couldn't be found for this suspicion.

Steal proven!

Except—no. There was a logical explanation, the voter rolls would appear different between these two dates if the ballots in question were “received and processed on election day,” because ballots received on Election Day are not part of the count in question.

You know who doesn't show up on Maricopa's ev32 (sent file) but will show up on the ev33 (early receive file)?

In person early voters not on the Permanent Early Voter List.

https://twitter.com/Garrett_Archer/s...87039866310657

[Nirgon]

Lol starting to admit it.... those statistical anomalies seen in the AZ data are *way* more pronounced in the other swing states. Do you realize how obvious it was for anyone with a functioning brain witnessing them tell everyone to leave for the night in Georgia, then start pushing tons through the machines again? Or when windows were boarded up and votes counted in secret?

We all knew it happened, now its proven. Who even knows how many elections have been stolen or made to look like close loses when they were blow outs at this point?