Michael Brown

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Basic human rights?

Yes.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since forever, being with the opposite sex has been the only thing.

This is not correct. Rome, Egypt, Ancient Asia... Please learn a bit of history.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reproducing has been the only thing.

This is also incorrect. Population control is a thing.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There has never been basic human rights implied for gay rights.

Tell that to the KKK, WBBC, The third reich, ISIS (the whole middle east in fact), China, Russia, Korea, most of Afriac/South America... should I continue?

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reread my earlier posts where you claim you were confused and it all makes sense. Do I think it is unacceptable to be gay? Absolutely and unequivocally.

Why?

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We live in a country though that gives gays the right to obtain the rights they have and I 100% full understand and accept that, but the way gays go about it and the BS they spew is absurd and retarded. If you want to fuck another dude or fuck a chick, that's fine.

These sentences are contradictory.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't argue scientific fact that doesn't exist or guilt everyone into accepting you...

Do you mean the genetic link towards sexual preference?
Do you mean homo/bi-sexuality that happens in nature across all sexually reproducing species?
Chemical stimuli during gestation that can effect sexuality?
Higher % of homosexual individuals in any population that has an unbalanced female/male ratio?

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but at the same time try and take away everyone else's rights.

I'm very interested in hearing about this list of rights that are being "taken away".

Good stuff. Either you're trolling or you're Ken Ham. Please answer every point of shut the fuck up. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Eliseus]

Rome and ancient Egypt only did it to either show dominance or just because they wanted to fuck something, anything, not because it was socially accepted to be gay.

Most the countries, if not all, have severe punishments for being gay, and even in countries like china that limit the amount of children, still aren't pro-gay which you imply.

The sentences are t contradictory.

That isn't scientific fact that you are born that way, you even prove it yourself by concluding with it being and environmental issue.

The list of rights taken away, are you a joking? You can't be this dumb.

Oh and to quote you. Either you are trolling or just straight up stupid. Thank you though because you do bring me back to reality a bit and realize there are really just straight up dumb people in the world.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The list of rights taken away, are you a joking? You can't be this dumb.

No please, we appreciate you expecting us to not be dumb enough to comprehend how insane your list is, but we want to see how much of a lunatic you really are.

By all means, go on.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rome and ancient Egypt only did it to either show dominance or just because they wanted to fuck something, anything, not because it was socially accepted to be gay.

English clearly isn't your first language, either that or you're a good representation of what the good ol' USA school system produces on a yearly basis.

You said "Since forever, being with the opposite sex has been the only thing." implying it didn't exist until recently, I provided you an example of over 5000 years ago where it happened, something your reply seems to agree with before you said something about social acceptability. Also interesting that you seem to know the reason 5000 year old civilizations had sex with what they had.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Most the countries, if not all, have severe punishments for being gay, and even in countries like china that limit the amount of children, still aren't pro-gay which you imply.

That's not what I implied at all. Again, your reading comprehension is terrible.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The sentences are t(oo) contradictory.

I agree

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That isn't scientific fact that you are born that way,

Yes, the same way gravity isn't scientific fact. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you even prove it yourself by concluding with it being and environmental issue.

So many things wrong here. First, concluding? It was my third of four examples, that's not a conclusion, learn English. Secondly hormones during gestation is one of many ways sexual preference can have a variance. Lastly, you are implying that a change during gestation does not change how you are born, I want you to think about that for a while then please realize that your line of thinking is not thinking at all.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The list of rights taken away, are you a joking? You can't be this dumb.

I didn't think you could provide any examples, thank you for confirming my theory.

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh and to quote you. Either you are trolling or just straight up stupid. Thank you though because you do bring me back to reality a bit and realize there are really just straight up dumb people in the world.

I have a feeling you were looking in the mirror while typing that drivel.

[Eliseus]

Just because you can tell some their reading comprehension as bad, doesn't make you right. How come whenever you get stuck in your fail corner you try and derail whatever predicament you have gotten yourself into into some English/grammar argument. Is that the only scapegoat you can use to try and show there may be some intelligence in your brain? You absolutely know what people mean most the time, yet try to use it as a way to escape when you fail. For example, your first response to my previous response. You know exactly what I meant, yet try and use it to save face. I could go through the millions of posts you use and do the same thing, fortunately, I won't.

[Eliseus]

Also typing from a phone sucks.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just because you can tell some their reading comprehension as bad, doesn't make you right. How come whenever you get stuck in your fail corner you try and derail whatever predicament you have gotten yourself into into some English/grammar argument. Is that the only scapegoat you can use to try and show there may be some intelligence in your brain? You absolutely know what people mean most the time, yet try to use it as a way to escape when you fail. For example, your first response to my previous response. You know exactly what I meant, yet try and use it to save face. I could go through the millions of posts you use and do the same thing, fortunately, I won't.

Again you make a claim and aren't backing it up. I've even explained my interpretation of your post. Others have made the same conclusions that I have. Back up your stance with facts of fuck off.

[Ratstomper]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's one of the flaws with the two party system. Balls to the wall or nothing instead of simple option 3. For example.


Gay marriage bans are wrong no matter what way you look at it, however at the same token, forcing priests to perform marriages against the will of their belief system is also wrong. If any of these lawmakers had a lick of sense, they'd allow the individual churches to decide whether or not they would allow same-sex marriages. The issue is the politicians who have money in it one way or the other so either side has much less gain if you make that sweet middle ground.

You'll have to be more specific but either way banning any kind of weapon should be considered unconstitutional (You should be able to purchase a rocket launcher, AAA gun, Tanks, Planes etc.) and gun-free zones absolutely don't work. This is coming from a social progressive who has never owned/fired a gun mind you. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know next to nothing about the nuances of casino issues since I don't gamble but am not anti-gambling. I do know from experience with the casinos (I think Trump?) recently wanted to set up in Western Mass, that it should be up to the individual districts and by extension the local voter populace, to decide whether or not they want to allow it, no different than deciding about an amusement park, movie theater, shopping mall etc..

So who of those is being oppressive and who is being oppressed?

I would agree with those points personally, but the guy down the street who doesn't agree has just as much say in matters as we do.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lmao its simply called Majority rule you moron.

No it isn't. Majority rule is when an informed populace makes decisions based on facts. In 2004, the media made a bull shit "swift boat" controversy... Karl Rove destroyed John Kerry without a fight. In 2012, the same thing was done to Romney, or do you forget "the War on women"? Which is precisely my point, ass holes like you guys hijack the discourse and make it about bull shit, and as a result the entire country loses. Congratulations

[Misto]

The last few pages of this thread have been about gay rights.

Which means I can only assume Michael Brown tried to put his penis in the white officer's ass.