TRUMP 2016

[MrSparkle001]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All you need to see to know to expect top tier writing.

You've clearly not even looked at the toupée's plan if you think "taxing the rich" is either revolutionary or something only one side is talking about doing. But God forbid you actually listen to what someone is actually proposing before regurgitating a pile of talking points.

Bee tee dubbs, my source on the Bern's financial plan is his own website.

Wasn't taxing the rich what liberals were all about for the past 8 years? How is it all of a sudden not acceptable? What he's saying (which still isn't much) is essentially what liberal candidates were saying in 2008 and 2012.

He even said it would hit himself pretty hard but it's necessary.

The trick is to not overtax them because they can leave the country, renounce their citizenship and take their money with them. Some already have.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Who said taxing the rich wasn't acceptable? I said that it's no longer a radical stance to take. I support the haves putting more into the system than the have-nots.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wasn't taxing the rich what liberals were all about for the past 8 years? How is it all of a sudden not acceptable? What he's saying (which still isn't much) is essentially what liberal candidates were saying in 2008 and 2012.

He even said it would hit himself pretty hard but it's necessary.

The trick is to not overtax them because they can leave the country, renounce their citizenship and take their money with them. Some already have.

one of Bernies sources of revenue is putting tax stock trades over $100.00 so you cant 'leave' the country to avoid it.

The revenue for this would be jaw dropping while also (as economists proved in the European market) makes the market a safer place to trade because it cuts down on 'automated high frequency trading'.

Trumps plans involve:

Cutting the top marginal rate from 39.6 percent to 25 percent
Eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax
Eliminate the estate tax
Cut the corporate tax rate to 15 percent

Which would would save his direct family billions of dollars.

Not to mention he is a racist fuck who wants to blow what little money would be left, on building gas chambers for the 11 million immigrants he despises so much.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Agatha [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i'd vote for trump if i actually voted. not because he is right, but because he is the only one not lieing about who he is.

go away you god damned sob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

.

Not to mention he is a racist fuck who wants to blow what little money would be left, on building gas chambers for the 11 million immigrants he despises so much.

Do you still wonder why nobody takes your dumb ass seriously?

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you still wonder why nobody takes your dumb ass seriously?

hmm you come here for serious debate? sad poster is sad.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Learn the difference between a discussion and a debate, pleb.

[iruinedyourday]

Honestly though I cant imagine why a nerd like kaga would be so in love with a media whore like Trump.. you like buzzfeed.com and shit? Like reality tv and stuff? I thought you were like into cool shit, not the kardashians.

[MrSparkle001]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who said taxing the rich wasn't acceptable? I said that it's no longer a radical stance to take. I support the haves putting more into the system than the have-nots.

Sorry I was actually agreeing with you, it just doesn't always translate well on a forum. Yeah it should be acceptable now, but maybe in some peoples' eyes it doesn't go far enough, like they want a truly socialist state because they themselves aren't rich (that's a much more common opinion than some would like to admit).

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry I was actually agreeing with you, it just doesn't always translate well on a forum. Yeah it should be acceptable now, but maybe in some peoples' eyes it doesn't go far enough, like they want a truly socialist state because they themselves aren't rich (that's a much more common opinion than some would like to admit).

Well the irony is people who would benefit the most from social programs like them the least.