|
View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit? | |||
yes | 327 | 68.99% | |
no | 147 | 31.01% | |
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
I see, so the non-csr rule inplemented here, what was the justification behind it? Is there some kind of proof out there somewhere that training was ever allowed on live Eq? As far as I've read(not saying I'm some kind of research whiz) training was always punishable by GMs on live as it was considered interference/disruptive regardless of the zone. In its current form VP is inpossible to zone into without 50 player forces (if 2 guilds are in zone) and the guild with the bigger train team wins. I don't believe that success in everquest was ever measured by such standards.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
#22
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| ||||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe this was post velious? I'm not sure why they would suddenly change classic zones to non csr though at that point.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
#24
|
|||
|
You'll have to do some research for the exact news post that implemented it, I'm sure that contains information. Or perhaps your fellow players will help. I'm not here to answer your question about why every policy exists, just to fix your misconceptions.
You're still comparing it to eqlive in the rest of your post. It's not an EQLive related policy. You should stop doing that.
__________________
| ||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#26
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
I wasn't calling you or any other gm/dev out with this post honestly just lookong to gauge server opinion as well as maybe acquiring new info regarding the matter.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
#28
|
|||
|
Tasslehofp99 needs to work on his reading comprehension.
__________________
| ||
|
#29
|
|||
|
I underatand.
I'm looking for the reasons why the p99 no csr policy was implemented when it seems pretty clear that the live server rules were a bit different. Like, was there a previous discussion that I may have overlooked? I'm failing to see why my post is warranting troll like responses when all I was looking for is information and opinions jeez. Sorry for being curious and bored at work.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | ||
|
#30
|
||||
|
I will throw this in from the server rules as well with some bolding to reinforce the thread.
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|