GM Available for Discussion on What are actually considered camps?

[Erica]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This devious how can I fuck someone over within the rules thinking is why this game sucks, on both a grouping and raiding level. Quit being a douche. Respect other people's camps. Most players consider Hands / WLs a singular camp, regardless of GM interference. Trying to restrict a group of 6 players to 4 mobs is just inhumane.

Why would you read that and assume it is something that I actively do, or want to do? I was pointing out that the definition of a camp the GM gave me is very flawed. Restricting a camp to what you can see, in a place with a ton of walls is not good. I am totally in favor of hand/WL and surrounding areas being one camp, but according to what the GM said it is not.

[Cecily]

That's the point. If you call a GM in to mediate a camp dispute, you'll likely get a resolution far less in your interest than just moving on or waiting for the camp to open. Camps are player defined, not GM defined. Learn what these are, and hope people agree to not be jerks about it.

[Swish]

Don't be lawyered off anything unless its a static spawn that someone was already sitting at when you turned up.

Unfortunately the sheen soon wears off the "help each other" mentality if there's pixels involved. TunnelQuest is srs business and not to be taken lightly on blue. Thankfully there's other servers if the bickering, sniping and lawyering gets to you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Cecily]

This thread wouldn't happen red.

[Daldaen]

Other servers where you can cross Norrath and not run into a single other person. Because bad rule sets lead to no one wanting to play on those servers.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Other servers where you can cross Norrath and not run into a single other person. Because bad rule sets lead to no one wanting to play on those servers.

That's just like...your opinion, Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daldaen]

Numbers don't lie friend.

Red is always 1/3rd or less than the population of blue. It's quite empty and you don't run into anyone :/. Especially since the entire server is /anon and /role. People are afraid to interact with others.

But... Since we are talking. I figured I'd share with you my favorite GIF:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one is ^ this level of rustled in this thread... But hot damn are the RNF ForumQuesters at Maximum Rustle.

[Swish]

You're right numbers don't lie. Red was regularly 1/10 of blue a few months ago, so 1/3 of blue is quite the achievement.

There's always people in gfay/crushbone, field of bone and such. If you started a troll/ogre or an erudite I'd see your point about not seeing anyone for a while [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daldaen]

1/3 was me being extremely generous. Currently it's about 1/5.

But if Red fixed all it's non-classic elements, it would be way more happening:

No PvP Yellow Text.
No global OOC
Standard Group EXP Bonuses, not this bogus that red has
Item Loot
No Item Clicky Recharge

Every time I get on red I end up logging after 5 minutes because of how unclassic it is. It ruins my immersion to see yellow text followed by 20 people saying PRAS in non-classic global OOC.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread wouldn't happen red.

That's because nothing happens on Red.