+/- 4 levels is too restrictive

[BigTB]

Originally Posted by Eslade [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You say this until you get to level 52 and a vp geared bard decimates your group with little to no recourse.

at least its pvp

[Eslade]

Originally Posted by BigTB [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

at least its pvp

True, but so is killing afks. Flagging system would fix the problem with having to watch your group members getting ganked and you can hunt higher levels if you wanted.

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Clark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like +/- 4. Is what rallos zek and zek used!

Sure and if they add item loot I'll agree with +/-4 but 6 at the very least would be better for 50+ when you suffer nothing from death.

[compulsion]

Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL nope I've killed so many 60's at lvl 52, but your right it was unfair...for them! Hell my wiz used the exact same nukes from 52-56 was absolutely no difference in those lvl's.

1 out of 14 classes getting significantly better at 51 with an obsolete and ridiculous resist code is not exactly justification for shifting the entire level range. Every other class lacks key tools that only become available 53-55. 6 level range would increase the amount of overall and competitive PvP while discouraging some camping of specific level breaks.

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by compulsion [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1 out of 14 classes getting significantly better at 51 with an obsolete and ridiculous resist code is not exactly justification for shifting the entire level range. Every other class lacks key tools that only become available 53-55. 6 level range would increase the amount of overall and competitive PvP while discouraging some camping of specific level breaks.

My point was if I can do it with the same damned spells and kill VP geared 60's in rags then quite your whining, that means your gonna get upgrades each lvl. My class didn't and I did just fine.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In a freaking Advisor robe fer christ sakes, basically the people crying about 8 lvls are gonna die anyways it's more a learn2play issue.

[Bazia]

as a wizard or druid u could be naked and get a kill

doesnt apply to most classes

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as a wizard or druid u could be naked and get a kill

doesnt apply to most classes

Sure prove it show me your screenshot of you killing VP geared toons in rags twinky?

Love how people always say it's something anyone can do, when they are someone who has never done it!

[Bazia]

i have a nude druid portbot just Blizzard + Scoraie = gg

doesnt require gear, but keep bein dumb

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i have a nude druid portbot just Blizzard + Scoraie = gg

doesnt require gear, but keep bein dumb

Where is this place that people sit under rains for 3 ticks lol could you point me to this wonder land!

I don't want theory-crafting I want proof, its so easy to say blah blah blah but 95% of the Wizards on this server never got a kill till they hit 60 and got epic'd.

[Bazia]

wizard hard pvp class ur right