Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: Should FA(T) wake the Sleeper to prevent Rampage from getting any more primals?
Hell Yeah 85 44.97%
Naw 47 24.87%
The Sleeper knocked down the towers when it sneezed 57 30.16%
Voters: 189. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2015, 06:42 PM
Kayso Kayso is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormfists [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thou art fatramps.
Rampage could ally and we'd be FART. Just sayin'.
  #22  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:00 PM
Efwan Efwan is offline
Fire Giant

Efwan's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 898
Default

Looks like the vote is 60 in favor 14 against, wake em!
__________________
  #23  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:46 PM
Stormfists Stormfists is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kayso [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rampage could ally and we'd be FART. Just sayin'.
Fat-tramps is better.
  #24  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:05 PM
Prismaticshop Prismaticshop is offline
Sarnak

Prismaticshop's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 323
Default

Not sure why FAT would, pretty sure they want loot. They pull same numbers as rampage did beginning of velious, so that's quite some people to get geared with wardens loot.

Rampage has benefited from 2months1/2 of uncontested ST race and soaked up enough primals / ST loot to wake him up, real question is if they would.

Any of the guilds that wake him up will die, the question is which one hates the other the most.

TRampage RMT'd off p99 once. They might do it again if they deem their time here over, that will probably also imply dick slapping their opponents by depriving them of wardens, cause let's admit, that's a spectacular ending.
  #25  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:12 PM
Lune Lune is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
>4 warders die
>kerafym wakes from his slumber
>everyone in sleeper's tomb is murdered
>kerafym zones out
>zones into EC
>kills everyone
>server crashes
>gdi haynar
I'm going to be disappointed if it's not something like this.

Honestly when Sleeper awakes a GM should take control of him and go from zone to zone slaughtering everyone, kind of like on Live how he supposedly rampaged across Velious. Except here it should be Norrath.

I already have the perfect GIF ready, from Desolation of Smaug where the neckbeards wake up the dragon and it burns all the noobs in laketown
  #26  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:17 PM
indiscriminate_hater indiscriminate_hater is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,758
Default

By the time FAT has enough keys to provide legitimate competition to Rampage in ST, and to have even a small chance in hell of getting primal, Rampage will have satisfied their primal weapon lust and probably wouldn't have an issue with waking the sleeper to prevent others from having them (at least not nearly as easily).

FAT's reason for waking the sleeper as soon as they can is to block Rampage from getting any more primals. Since they don't seem likely to ever get any primals off wardens, FAT has relatively little to lose by this maneuver, while Rampage would potentially suffer quite a bit.

It's a spite move, to be sure, but isn't that what Rampage is planning to do anyhow? Why get the shit end of the stick when you can dish it out yourself?
  #27  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:45 PM
ArumTP ArumTP is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indiscriminate_hater [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
By the time FAT has enough keys to provide legitimate competition to Rampage in ST, and to have even a small chance in hell of getting primal, Rampage will have satisfied their primal weapon lust and probably wouldn't have an issue with waking the sleeper to prevent others from having them (at least not nearly as easily).

FAT's reason for waking the sleeper as soon as they can is to block Rampage from getting any more primals. Since they don't seem likely to ever get any primals off wardens, FAT has relatively little to lose by this maneuver, while Rampage would potentially suffer quite a bit.

It's a spite move, to be sure, but isn't that what Rampage is planning to do anyhow? Why get the shit end of the stick when you can dish it out yourself?
It is Foegard with the sleepers keys. Taken isn't involved with any of that mess. We have maybe a dozen keys and a single primal. Soon as that force even gets close to massing in or around sleepers, rampage batphones are alarmed and they go in griefing mode.

I doubt that foegard would wake sleeper due to lack of loots from there. Rampage is very protective of this zone, and only does that shit to deny others. I think they are good on primal weapons, just need the other warder stuff, as I have seen casters running around with primal 2-handers. It will be rampage that wakes them, they got the keys and the motivation to shut that zone down from others.
__________________
Arum Cleric
Ticklebottom Warrior
Servilius Rogue
  #28  
Old 12-01-2015, 09:06 PM
ManuelThePopStar ManuelThePopStar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not sure why FAT would, pretty sure they want loot. They pull same numbers as rampage did beginning of velious, so that's quite some people to get geared with wardens loot.

Rampage has benefited from 2months1/2 of uncontested ST race and soaked up enough primals / ST loot to wake him up, real question is if they would.

Any of the guilds that wake him up will die, the question is which one hates the other the most.

TRampage RMT'd off p99 once. They might do it again if they deem their time here over, that will probably also imply dick slapping their opponents by depriving them of wardens, cause let's admit, that's a spectacular ending.
I think more notably in this case is that depriving the rest of the server of Warders will drastically increase the value of ST droppables as well as Warder-geared toons (when it's time to RMT off the server)
  #29  
Old 12-02-2015, 04:53 AM
Pint Pint is offline
Planar Protector

Pint's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Plane of Hate
Posts: 2,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManuelThePopStar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think more notably in this case is that depriving the rest of the server of Warders will drastically increase the value of ST droppables as well as Warder-geared toons (when it's time to RMT off the server)
Nailed it
__________________
Pint
  #30  
Old 12-02-2015, 06:23 AM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManuelThePopStar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think more notably in this case is that depriving the rest of the server of Warders will drastically increase the value of ST droppables as well as Warder-geared toons (when it's time to RMT off the server)
It is the same guild that RMT'ed off the server before. People tend to forget that.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.