Case for a pvp teams server

[Nihilist_santa]

Teams, 1 account per IP, and item loot. That should be the goal. IMO red is a cesspool because of all of the history and the fact rep doesn't mean shit when people have 20 accounts.

Also Sektorz is like player repellent. Anyone who comes to these forums and can see this dudes post glorifying his RMT past and disregard for the rules while being allowed to play here still will cringe. Unless the goal is to attract like minded scum?

[Doctor Jeff]

People keep saying item loot. I hope were on the same page of FULL item loot here. The only reason to run back to your corpse after dying should be to check if maybe the person who killed you did not have enough bag space/did not delete all your items.

[Nihilist_santa]

Full item loot creates a negative scenario as far as risk vs reward. 1 item loot is sufficient. I personally think they should remove the no drop flag as well (only in instances of a player kill)since you will just have people in no-drop gear ganking anyone with anything of value. I remember people deleveled in planar back in the day for that.

[One Tin Soldier]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

raiding on a pvp team server does have a problem; certain classes cannot be on each team.

good side will have:

paladin
druid
ranger
and possibly bard

evil will have
necro,
SK

the rest are more so neutral. I suppose a bard can be neutral too; but they are mostly good . also pre kunark has no evil monks.

how would neutral races determine what team to be on? and will options for ralloz zek following wood elves still be considered evil just like on live.

Here's a radical idea. Given the less than ideal nature of raiding on this emulator how about simply not having raids on a PvP server. Lock certain zones like the planes. Don't spawn raid targets in other zones. Just don't even make that part of the game. Instead let people earn something from PvP kills; points, currency, or just generate a item like --One Tin Soldiers head-- which could be exchanged for loot at some special vendor.

Ya ya, not classic...but why not experiment. Let a pvp server actually be about pvp.

[Happy]

I love this idea and would definitely play on it. But, realistically - we didn't even get the Discord server when we were promised it. The notion of a teams PVP server is more like a pipe dream at this point : \

[Turp]

I believe Daybreak put a stop to anything p99 that could threaten the servers they are banking off of.
Daybreak have not did a PvP version of their "classic" servers yet right?
So AFTER they do, i'd say p99 will then get one.
They are probably waiting for Phinny to die down then they will release the PvP version of it because , its evercrack. People are gonna at least try it (buy it) and they probably told (or paid) to delay us here.
Think about it.

[wwoneo]

This isn't going to happen. The staff did mention this approximately 2-3 years ago, stating they were going to make this happen. However, I recently asked Rogean about it and he basically laughed in my face with a Gary Busy jif!

[Ziggy]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

raiding on a pvp team server does have a problem; certain classes cannot be on each team.

good side will have:

paladin
druid
ranger
and possibly bard

evil will have
necro,
SK

the rest are more so neutral. I suppose a bard can be neutral too; but they are mostly good . also pre kunark has no evil monks.

how would neutral races determine what team to be on? and will options for ralloz zek following wood elves still be considered evil just like on live.

its not a problem its a feature

[Tune]

i do not count 1 person on this thread that actually plays

[silo32]

Originally Posted by Tune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i do not count 1 person on this thread that actually plays

just us tbh

if these nerds are not playing red99 now they wont last on the "new pvp" server

burnouts all of you