FOX vs CNN (my analysis)

[fash]

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What I am really seeking is other perspectives on the best sources of information regarding Geo political and economic news.

Honestly, if you're looking for legacy mainstream media sources, the only option is to read/listen to stories from multiple stories and try to separate the facts from spin. I can't think of one legacy media outlet that honestly tries to present an "unbiased" point of view.

The problem is traditional, neutral journalism doesn't sell. Even if a company has ethical journalists that want to inform the public neutrally, they simply are overshadowed by the editorializing that has become necessary to keep their business afloat today.

The only place you'll find neutral journalists that control the pov from investigation to reporting is in (a small portion) of alternative media.

[icedwards]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only place you'll find neutral journalists that control the pov from investigation to reporting is in (a small portion) of alternative media.

I'd love to know what alternative media a guy with a forum handle Fash considers neutral journalism [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]




Stick to Reuters OP

[fash]

Originally Posted by icedwards [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd love to know what alternative media a guy with a forum handle Fash considers neutral journalism [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tim Pool is a good example. Hated by both the left and right.

What kind of media does a guy with a forum handle icedwards consider neutral journalism? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[icedwards]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tim Pool is a good example. Hated by both the left and right.

What kind of media does a guy with a forum handle icedwards consider neutral journalism? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do we really have to go through this whole song and dance where you feign dumb or can we just skip straight to the part where you try to convince us The Daily Stormer is a reputable news source?

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly, if you're looking for legacy mainstream media sources, the only option is to read/listen to stories from multiple stories and try to separate the facts from spin.

This is 100% true imo.

I scour the internet when I really want to learn about a specific event. There is so much misinformation though sometimes it makes your head spin because you will find so many different accounts of what actually happened.

On one hand it's great to have so many sources of information but on the other hand this vast ocean of information also has oceans of misinformation too.

There's no question information is contaminated purposefully to derail the truth regarding any noteworthy event so you really have to scour for the truth and sometimes I honestly believe it's simply impossible to find the truth.

There's no true neutral source of information either I have come to find. That's why you are better off taking in as much as you can from all different sources and try to piece things together try to glean the truth from all the sources of info you read from.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by hyejin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I subscribe to the New York Times. How about y'all?

reppin NYT baby

*daps whale*

[JurisDictum]

The truth about the NYT is it's the USA state paper in regards to Foreign Policy. But we are a little more ethical and balanced than China.

It's not corrupt unless you view it that way. FP officials have to pick a paper to talk to don't they? Most news networks can't even afford to hire FP journalists -- too damn expensive for articles the public doesn't even understand.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The truth about the NYT is it's the USA state paper in regards to Foreign Policy. But we are a little more ethical and balanced than China.

It's not corrupt unless you view it that way. FP officials have to pick a paper to talk to don't they? Most news networks can't even afford to hire FP journalists -- too damn expensive for articles the public doesn't even understand.

I heard the Washington Post actually has a C;A shell company that owns a large controlling stake of the newspaper.

Having trouble proving it but its in the works. Its one of those darkweb deepstate infograms that had the info.

the NYT is just cucked and requires no such hands-on ballsack approach.

[skarlorn]

I tend to prefer BBC myself

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by skarlorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I tend to prefer BBC myself

I bet you do.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]